Wilmer Staring Down $13M Lawsuit Over Contract That Led to 'Litigation Bonanza'
The law firm prepared a stock purchasing agreement between two former business partners, who now disagree over the financial terms, prompting a legal battle one federal judge described as akin to "The War of the Roses."
February 11, 2020 at 02:24 PM
3 minute read
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr is fighting back against a $13 million lawsuit alleging it was negligent in preparing the stock purchasing agreement between two former, embittered business partners.
The stock purchasing agreement between John DeBlasio and Thomas Charron led to a lawsuit one federal judge described as a "litigation bonanza rivaling Warren Adler's 'The War of the Roses.'" DeBlasio later sued Wilmer in April 2019, saying the firm's negligence cost him at least $13 million in damages. Discovery is set to end in the case March 1.
DeBlasio and Charron were U.S. Military Academy at West Point graduates who became military contractors, creating a company known as Sallyport Global Holdings. Over time, their personal and professional relationships deteriorated, to the point where they had to retain outside consultants to communicate.
DeBlasio offered to buy out Charron's 50% shares in Sallyport, and Wilmer was retained in February 2010 to craft that agreement. The stock purchase agreement contained a "windfall provision" that would give Charron 20% of the proceeds if DeBlasio sold Sallyport within a year.
However, DeBlasio contended Charron wasn't entitled to that cut unless Sallyport was sold for at least $65 million. That language was drafted, but, as U.S. District Judge William Pauley of the Southern District of New York noted, it was never included in the final agreement.
"Wilmer further breached the duty of care it owed to plaintiffs by negligently failing to inform and/or warn Mr. DeBlasio that the terms of the windfall protection clause would not operate as they had represented to him," DeBlasio said in his lawsuit.
Charron sued DeBlasio in September 2012 in the Southern District of New York after learning his former business partner sold Sallyport to DC Partners, a private equity firm, for $64.5 million. Pauley ruled in favor of Charron in December 2014, finding that the windfall provision gave him a 20% cut of the sale, regardless of the amount.
Pauley awarded Charron $15.7 million, which is 20% of $78 million, the real amount Sallyport sold for, the judge determined.
"This lawsuit is a sad denouncement to what began as a vibrant and symbiotic partnership between two West Point graduates," Pauley said, before adding that this "business divorce should have never spilled into a federal courtroom."
Pauley referenced Adler's "The War of the Roses." Although ostensibly named for the 37 years of civil war England experienced as warring noble houses competed for the throne, Adler's book is about a married couple that falls out of love.
DeBlasio's lawsuit, filed in D.C. Superior Court, levels charges of professional negligence, breach of fiduciary duty of undivided loyalty and negligent misrepresentation against Wilmer.
Wilmer is represented by lawyers from Carr Maloney in Washington and Goulston & Storrs in Boston. Richard Zielinski, a director at Goulston & Storrs, declined to comment.
DeBlasio is represented by Tom Watson and Curtis Renner of Watson & Renner; they did not respond to requests of comment as of press time.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250