Deadline Extended to April 3: The National Law Journal's 2020 Washington D.C. Litigation Departments of the Year
The National Law Journal is now accepting nominations for its Washington D.C. Litigation Departments of the Year competition. The Litigation Departments of the Year competition is open to any law firm with an office in the D.C. metro area.
February 13, 2020 at 02:58 PM
6 minute read
The National Law Journal is now accepting nominations for its Washington D.C. Litigation Departments of the Year competition. The Litigation Departments of the Year competition is open to any law firm with an office in the D.C. metro area.
Overview: The competition has two distinct categories:
- A contest to award the top department in general litigation and
- A contest to determine the top specialty practice groups.
- Submit matters led by lawyers from the D.C. metro area. Cases may include those filed or tried in a D.C.-area court and/or those filed or tried outside of the D.C. area (as long as they are led by lawyers from the D.C. area.)
- Please fill out separate submissions for the general litigation and specialty practice contests.
- We plan to name winners in each category, but depending on the entrant pool, we may have multiple winners or runners-up in one group and none in another.
- The submission deadline for both branches of this competition is March 30.
Please click here to submit your nomination
Deadline has been extended to April 3.
Details on Submission Materials
For each contest, we are asking you to submit:
- An overview essay explaining why your firm should win. 900 words maximum.
- A list of cases with brief descriptions of their significance. 1500 words maximum.
- A brief description of three upcoming matters at your firm. 600 words maximum.
GENERAL LITIGATION CONTEST
Client Matter Listing
Please describe up to 8 litigation results that demonstrate your department's excellence. 1500 words maximum.
- This list can and should include results obtained pre-trial, at trial or on appeal. It may include pro bono cases. Client matter results must have occurred between Jan. 1, 2019 and Dec. 31, 2019.
- Please rank your top 5 client matters in terms of importance. By importance, we mean both significance of the result for your client and contribution made by your lawyers. Note: You can rank all the cases if you like, but ranking is only required for the top 5.
- Each result must have been achieved by lawyers while they were members of your firm based in your D.C. office. Do not include results achieved by lateral hires while they were working for another firm.
- For each client matter result, please include the names of: 1) clients, 2) lead partners and 3) opposing counsel, as well as contact information for at least two clients per matter.
- Descriptions of results should include specific dollar amounts where relevant, but should focus on why the result demonstrates the excellence of your department.
- For each case, please include a case number and jurisdiction.
- DO NOT SUBMIT CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: All information submitted will be considered on-the-record and included in the evaluation process.
- If your client was represented by more than one firm, please specify your firm's leadership role and estimate what percentage of client matter work your firm completed versus co-counsel.
- In your submission, please include a firm contact to whom we may contact with questions.
Essay
Make the case for why your firm should win! 900 words maximum
- Tell us why you should win. Factors we're looking for are the importance and difficulty of the matters handled; the quality of opposing counsel; ingenuity and diligence.
Upcoming Matters
- Include a brief description of three upcoming matters for your firm. 600 words maximum
Firm Stats and Client References
We'll also request additional information on:
- The size of your firm's litigation department in D.C. and firmwide as of Dec. 31, 2019. (Please specify number of partners, associates and others).
- The percentage of your entire firm represented by the litigation department in terms of lawyers.
- Describe your firm's biggest litigation loss in the past two years, with names of opposing counsel.
Questions?
Please contact Pearl Wu at Manager, Recognition Desk, Editorial at [email protected].
SPECIALTY PRACTICE AREA CONTEST
The specialty contest will award departments focused in each of five areas:
- Intellectual Property
- Products Liability/Mass Torts
- Labor and Employment
- Insurance and
- White Collar Defense
You may compete in more than one category. Note: Separate submissions will be expected for each.
Describe up to 5 litigation results that demonstrate your department's excellence in this specialty. 1500 words maximum.
- This list should include both trial and appellate work.
- The results must have occurred between Jan. 1, 2019 and Dec. 31, 2019.
- Each result must have been achieved by lawyers while they were members of your firm based in your D.C. office. Do not include results achieved by lateral hires when they were working for a different firm.
- For each result, please include the names of clients, lead partners and opposing counsel, as well as contact information for all involved whenever possible.
- Descriptions of results should include specific dollar amounts where relevant, but should focus on why the result demonstrates the excellence of your department.
- For each case, please include a case number and jurisdiction.
- PLEASE DO NOT SUBMIT CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: All information submitted will be considered on-the-record and included in the evaluation process.
- Note: If your client was represented by more than one firm, please specify your firm's role.
- In your submission, please name someone at your firm whom we may contact with questions.
Please submit additional information on:
- The size of your firm's litigation department in D.C. and firmwide as of Dec. 31, 2019. Please specify number of partners, associates and others.
- The percentage of your entire firm represented by the litigation department in terms of lawyers.
- Three to four client references per specialty practice area, including phone numbers or e-mail addresses.
- Describe your firm's biggest litigation loss in the past two years, with names of opposing counsel.
- A brief description of three upcoming matters for your firm. 600 words maximum.
Write an essay explaining why your firm should be a finalist in this specialty area.
- Essay should be no longer than 900 words.
- Tell us why you should win. Factors we're looking for include importance and difficulty of the matters handled; the quality of opposing counsel; ingenuity and diligence.
Questions?
Please contact Pearl Wu at Manager, Recognition Desk, Editorial at [email protected].
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHours After Trump Takes Office, Democratic AGs Target Birthright Citizenship Order
4 minute readClimate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250