Invoking the 'Interest of Justice,' Judge Taps Sidley Austin's Alan Raul to Represent Roger Stone Jurors
Raul is a former associate counsel to President Ronald Reagan, a member of the conservative group Checks and Balances and the head of Sidley Austin's privacy and cybersecurity practice.
March 02, 2020 at 05:11 PM
5 minute read
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the District of Columbia is turning to Sidley Austin partner Alan Raul for pro bono representation of jurors from Roger Stone's trial as right-wing figure Mike Cernovich goes to court to obtain copies of questionnaires they filled out ahead of jury selection.
Cernovich, represented by the outspoken Connecticut attorney Norm Pattis of T he Pattis & Smith Law Firm—who most recently made headlines with his representation of the late Fotis Dulos on murder charges—last week filed a motion seeking the juror voir dire identification number of the jury's foreperson and jury questionnaires in the case. The main motion to intervene repeatedly misspelled the term for the questioning of prospective jurors as "voire dire."
That motion focuses on the jury's foreperson, Tomeka Hart—who publicly identified herself through social media posts last month—and responses she gave on her questionnaire. Cernovich argues in the filing that her "public conduct has raised grave constitutional concerns regarding the fairness of the jury trial in the instant matter."
"Mr. Cernovich, as a journalist and a concerned citizen, respectfully requests the court to allow him to exercise his right under the First Amendment to investigate [Hart]," the motion reads.
On Monday, in a new court docket created to handle the request for the juror questionnaires, Jackson said she had determined "that it would be in the interest of justice and that it would aid the court in the full and fair resolution of this miscellaneous matter to appoint pro bono counsel to represent any juror or jurors who choose to participate in it."
The judge said she was appointing Raul in accordance with local rules "and in accordance with its general supervisory authority over its docket."
Jackson's order did not provide her reasons for selecting Raul. Raul did not return a request for comment.
Raul is a former associate counsel to President Ronald Reagan and founder of Sidley Austin's privacy and cybersecurity practice. Raul is also a member of the American Bar Association's Cybersecurity Legal Task Force and the Center for Democracy and Technology's advisory committee.
His prior federal government work includes stints as general counsel for the Office of Management and Budget and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
He is also a member of Checks and Balances, a group of conservative lawyers outspoken against President Donald Trump. Other members of the group have been critical of Main Justice intervening in line prosecutors' sentencing recommendation for Stone.
Those remarks have been amplified on the organization's social media channels, but the group itself has not issued a formal statement on the Stone sentencing. Raul does not appear to have made public remarks about the Stone case.
Raul has signed past Checks and Balances letters critical of the Trump administration, including one from October that urged an "expeditious" impeachment inquiry into Trump over allegations he directed a hold on Ukrainian military aid in exchange for investigations into his political rivals, the Bidens.
Jackson has recently raised the safety of the jurors in Stone's case as of paramount importance. During a hearing last week in Stone's bid for a new trial, she read aloud tweets by Trump attacking the jury's foreperson and commentary by others like Fox News' Tucker Carlson as further putting the jurors in potential danger.
The judge cited a supplemental filing by DOJ in expressing concerns about the jurors' safety. She also called up a deputy marshal to the bench, along with one attorney from each party, to receive additional information, with the condition that information not be shared with anyone else, including other counsel.
Jackson has yet to rule on Stone's motion for a new trial, which also hinges on responses Hart gave on her juror questionnaire. At the hearing on the motion, two of Hart's fellow jurors took the stand and defended her conduct, with one saying Hart had pushed the jury to spend more time considering one of the charges against Stone.
The federal jury found Stone guilty in November of seven charges of lying to Congress, impeding a congressional investigation and witness tampering. Jackson sentenced Stone last month to 40 months in federal prison, but speculation is rampant that Trump may pardon his longtime ally.
The judge blocked anyone at last week's hearing from using the names or juror numbers of any members of the jury, most of which were at the courthouse for the proceeding. She has also blocked anyone involved in Cernovich's bid for the juror questionnaires from using the jurors' names or other identifying information.
Cernovich is not the only figure on the right associated with the juror questionnaires: Two other figures, Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman, last week said they were releasing copies of the questionnaires, which have not otherwise been made public.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTexas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250