Wells Fargo Hired Wilmer, Debevoise for Latest US House Hearings
Debevoise partners Mary Jo White and David Sarratt helped prep board members ahead of their Wednesday appearance. The bank's new chief executive, Charlie Scharf, had been prepped by Wilmer partners Reginald Brown and Jeremy Dresner.
March 11, 2020 at 02:07 PM
6 minute read
Updated at 5:28 p.m.
Facing back-to-back days of U.S. House hearings, Wells Fargo turned to the law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr to prepare the bank's new chief executive, Charlie Scharf, and hired Debevoise & Plimpton to advise a pair of former board members who resigned just days ahead of their planned testimony.
The hearings, held Tuesday and Wednesday, followed the House Financial Services Committee's release of a damning report documenting years of alleged mismanagement that exposed consumers to "countless abuses, including racial discrimination, wrongful foreclosure, illegal vehicle repossession, and fraudulently opened accounts."
Just days before they were set to appear before the House panel, the chairwoman of Wells Fargo's board, Elizabeth Duke, and board member James Quigley resigned after being portrayed in the committee report as slow to address the bank's consumer abuses.
Wells Fargo hired Debevoise partners Mary Jo White and David Sarratt to prep the board members ahead of their Wednesday appearance before the House Financial Services Committee. White, a former U.S. attorney in Manhattan, led the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission during the Obama administration.
In his testimony Tuesday, Scharf acknowledged the broken culture behind Wells Fargo's past scandals but projected confidence in the bank's ability to address those failings. Scharf had been prepped by Wilmer partners Jeremy Dresner and Reginald Brown, a leading congressional investigations lawyer who has advised Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other high-profile executives ahead of appearances on Capitol Hill. Wilmer declined to comment.
As the third Wells Fargo CEO to appear before the House Financial Services Committee in as many years, Scharf drew some gallows humor from the panel. A few lawmakers questioned why he took up the task of reforming a bank bogged down in scandal.
"I wish you luck," Rep. Maxine Waters, D-California, told him Tuesday. "It is clear to this committee that the bank you inherited is essentially a lawless organization that has caused widespread harm to millions of consumers throughout the nation."
Under Waters' leadership, the House Financial Services Committee has established itself as an especially formidable panel as Democrats have seized on their majority to undertake aggressive investigations. Among lawyers who specialize in advising companies through congressional investigations, Waters' committee is known for having a particular proclivity for summoning top executives for questioning.
Waters had previously called Scharf's predecessor, Tim Sloan, who stepped down in March 2019. On Tuesday, Waters asked the Justice Department to investigate whether Sloan had made false statements to Congress in a hearing held just weeks before his resignation.
In a letter to U.S. Attorney General William Barr, Waters alleged Sloan "gave inaccurate and misleading testimony" about the bank's efforts to comply with settlement agreements reached in 2016 and 2018. Wells Fargo agreed to pay $185 million in 2016 to resolve an investigation into the bank's widespread practice of opening accounts for consumers without their consent. In 2018, Wells Fargo reached a separate settlement with the Federal Reserve resolving claims that the board's failures facilitated "widespread consumer abuses and compliance breakdowns."
A lawyer for Sloan, Josh Cohen of Clarence Dyer & Cohen in San Francisco, said in a statement Wednesday: "The allegation that Tim Sloan provided inaccurate and misleading testimony to the House Financial Services Committee is completely unfounded. Mr. Sloan described the considerable efforts that Wells Fargo made under his leadership to comply with the consent orders and directives of regulators. His testimony to the Committee about those efforts was truthful and in good faith."
More recently, Wells Fargo reached a $3 billion settlement with the Justice Department and SEC resolving allegations stemming from the bank's fake accounts scandal. Lawyers from Sullivan & Cromwell, including Nicolas Bourtin and Christopher Viapiano, helped Wells Fargo navigate the agreement. Bourtin is managing partner of the firm's criminal defense and investigations group.
In its investigation of Wells Fargo, the House committee convinced regulators to turn over confidential supervisory information, helping the panel's staff produce a 113-page report that cast the board as complacent in the bank's response to a string of scandals. The report documents a meeting in November 2017 where Duke questioned why the CFPB included her on letters concerning the bank's compliance with the terms of the 2016 sales-practices settlement.
"Why are you sending it to me, the board, rather than the department manager?" she asked, according to notes from the 2017 meeting.
At Wednesday's hearing, Waters took the rare step of calling board members from a major company. Duke and Quigley resigned Sunday, saying they hoped their departures would "facilitate the bank's and the new CEO's ability to turn the page and avoid distraction that could impede the bank's future progress."
With Debevoise's Sarratt seated behind them, Duke and Quigley each stressed that they hoped their departures would help Wells Fargo "turn the page and focus on the future."
In a scathing address, Waters noted that the two had resigned after she had called for them to step down.
"But their resignations do not absolve them of their failures," Waters said. "Directors at Wells Fargo and institutions across this country must understand that they are the last line of defense when it comes to protecting their companies' shareholders, employees and customers. And while Ms. Duke and Mr. Quigley said they resigned to 'avoid distraction,' let me be clear that this is not a distraction—we are examining misconduct and dereliction of duty."
Debevoise Partner Leads Deutsche Bank's Response to Mueller's Russia Probe
|This report was updated to include comment from a lawyer for Tim Sloan.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Erroneous Assumption'?: Apple Challenges DOJ Antitrust Remedy in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readAdvertising Tech Likely to Draw More Scrutiny in 2025 Over Consumers' Data, Lawyers Say
5 minute readNew Year Brings New Partner Hires for White & Case, Venable, Winston & Strawn
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 2Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 3Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 4Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
- 5Burr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250