DC Chief Judge Postpones Proceedings Until Mid-April, Trials Until May Over Coronavirus
Judge Beryl Howell wrote that the court "finds that the ends of justice served by these continuances to protect public health and safety and the fair trial rights of the defendant outweigh the best interests of the public and any defendant's right to a speedy trial."
March 16, 2020 at 08:19 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. district chief judge for the District of Columbia on Monday issued an order postponing all civil and criminal trials until May 11, and other proceedings until April 17 over concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic.
U.S. District Chief Judge Beryl Howell wrote that the court "finds that the ends of justice served by these continuances to protect public health and safety and the fair trial rights of the defendant outweigh the best interests of the public and any defendant's right to a speedy trial."
Howell said the federal trial and bankruptcy courts in D.C. will be open with limited operations "to support essential functions in criminal, civil and bankruptcy matters in a matter to ensure public safety, public health and welfare."
She said judges overseeing non-jury trial proceedings, including hearings, court appearances and grand jury sessions, could issue orders directing those proceedings be held through teleconference, videoconference or in-person on or before the April 17 cut-off date.
The judge pointed to the declaration of a global pandemic over coronavirus, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommendations on limited public gatherings, and other local restrictions that reflect "the seriousness of the need to combat the community spread of the virus."
Howell also cited the court's "reduced ability to obtain an adequate spectrum of prospective jurors due to juror concerns regarding health and safety" in delaying the trials.
The D.C. federal courthouse had already restricted visitors to judges, court staff, members of the media and others who had official court business.
Howell's order came down hours after the U.S. Supreme Court announced it would postpone its upcoming arguments, set to be held March 23 to 25 and March 30 to April 1, over the public health measures implemented in response to COVID-19.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which is set to next hear arguments Friday, has instructed attorneys to not appear at the courthouse if they are exhibiting symptoms of coronavirus, and encouraged others to not attend arguments in-person and instead listen through the court's online livestream.
Several judges scheduled to hold hearings in the Washington, D.C., federal courthouse this week have already ordered the typically in-person hearings to instead be held by phone.
Some attorneys have also requested that hearings this week be transferred to phone conferences. Lawyers from the Justice Department and the group Protect Democracy filed a motion earlier Monday, asking that a hearing in a public records case scheduled for Thursday be held by phone due to public health concerns about the coronavirus.
On Monday evening, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras rejected that motion, "given that a teleconference would implicate similar concerns by requiring court personnel (including a courtroom deputy, court reporter, etc.) to travel to the courthouse." He vacated the hearing and instructed the parties to file briefs with the court instead.
Read more:
US Supreme Court Postpones Upcoming Arguments Amid Coronavirus Threat
As Coronavirus Threat Grows, More Courts Curb Access and Limit Oral Arguments
Paul Weiss' Brad Karp: We Need Obama, Bush and Clinton to Beat the Coronavirus
'All Hands on Deck' for Labor and Employment Firms Facing Flood of Employer Questions
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Lack of Independence' or 'Tethered to the Law'? Witnesses Speak on Bondi
4 minute readDOT Nominee Duffy Pledges Safety, Faster Infrastructure Spending in Confirmation Hearing
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250