DC Chief Judge Postpones Proceedings Until Mid-April, Trials Until May Over Coronavirus
Judge Beryl Howell wrote that the court "finds that the ends of justice served by these continuances to protect public health and safety and the fair trial rights of the defendant outweigh the best interests of the public and any defendant's right to a speedy trial."
March 16, 2020 at 08:19 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. district chief judge for the District of Columbia on Monday issued an order postponing all civil and criminal trials until May 11, and other proceedings until April 17 over concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic.
U.S. District Chief Judge Beryl Howell wrote that the court "finds that the ends of justice served by these continuances to protect public health and safety and the fair trial rights of the defendant outweigh the best interests of the public and any defendant's right to a speedy trial."
Howell said the federal trial and bankruptcy courts in D.C. will be open with limited operations "to support essential functions in criminal, civil and bankruptcy matters in a matter to ensure public safety, public health and welfare."
She said judges overseeing non-jury trial proceedings, including hearings, court appearances and grand jury sessions, could issue orders directing those proceedings be held through teleconference, videoconference or in-person on or before the April 17 cut-off date.
The judge pointed to the declaration of a global pandemic over coronavirus, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommendations on limited public gatherings, and other local restrictions that reflect "the seriousness of the need to combat the community spread of the virus."
Howell also cited the court's "reduced ability to obtain an adequate spectrum of prospective jurors due to juror concerns regarding health and safety" in delaying the trials.
The D.C. federal courthouse had already restricted visitors to judges, court staff, members of the media and others who had official court business.
Howell's order came down hours after the U.S. Supreme Court announced it would postpone its upcoming arguments, set to be held March 23 to 25 and March 30 to April 1, over the public health measures implemented in response to COVID-19.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which is set to next hear arguments Friday, has instructed attorneys to not appear at the courthouse if they are exhibiting symptoms of coronavirus, and encouraged others to not attend arguments in-person and instead listen through the court's online livestream.
Several judges scheduled to hold hearings in the Washington, D.C., federal courthouse this week have already ordered the typically in-person hearings to instead be held by phone.
Some attorneys have also requested that hearings this week be transferred to phone conferences. Lawyers from the Justice Department and the group Protect Democracy filed a motion earlier Monday, asking that a hearing in a public records case scheduled for Thursday be held by phone due to public health concerns about the coronavirus.
On Monday evening, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras rejected that motion, "given that a teleconference would implicate similar concerns by requiring court personnel (including a courtroom deputy, court reporter, etc.) to travel to the courthouse." He vacated the hearing and instructed the parties to file briefs with the court instead.
Read more:
US Supreme Court Postpones Upcoming Arguments Amid Coronavirus Threat
As Coronavirus Threat Grows, More Courts Curb Access and Limit Oral Arguments
Paul Weiss' Brad Karp: We Need Obama, Bush and Clinton to Beat the Coronavirus
'All Hands on Deck' for Labor and Employment Firms Facing Flood of Employer Questions
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readTrump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trump-Appointed Judge Presides Over NASCAR Antitrust Dispute Under Case Reassignment
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 15 Longtime Broward County Judges Set to Retire by End of 2024
- 2Top Five Florida Settlements of 2024
- 3Black, Hispanic Law Student Enrollment Falls at Top 14 Following End of Affirmative Action, but Mostly Improved at California's Top Schools
- 4Justices Wade Into South Carolina's Medicaid Fight With Planned Parenthood
- 5Fisher & Phillips Elects 25 New Partners In 15 Cities
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250