California Chief Justice Suspends Trials Statewide for 60 Days
The order also empowered trial courts to adopt any new or amended rules intended to address the COVID-19 pandemic.
March 24, 2020 at 12:17 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Under pressure from anxious lawyers, court workers and judges around the state, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye late Monday suspended all jury trials across the state for 60 days.
In an order citing constitutional and statutory authority, the chief justice also empowered trial courts to adopt "any proposed rules or rule amendment" intended to address the COVID-19 pandemic. The courts' rule changes will not have to circulate for the typical 45 days of public comment.
The order notes that courts have not been able to comply with orders for Californians to stay home and to maintain six feet of distance among themselves.
"Even if court facilities could allow for sufficient social distancing, the closure of schools means that many court employees, litigants, witnesses, and potential jurors cannot leave their homes to attend court proceedings because they must stay home to supervise their children," the order said. "These restrictions have also made it nearly impossible for courts to assemble juries."
For more than a week, Cantil-Sakauye has signed emergency orders for courts around the state, authorizing presiding judges to extend filing and proceeding deadlines and to move hearings to locations outside traditional courthouses. The result has been a patchwork of rules, with some courts shutting down and others scaling back operations but still allowing public access.
Prosecutors, private attorneys and public defenders have pleaded with the chief justice in recent days to employ uniform standards across the courts. Cantil-Sakauye has repeatedly referred in statements to her limited authority "as well as the role of independent trial courts to manage their operations."
That stance appeared to soften with the new order, which followed four days of reports of potential exposures in three courthouses.
On Thursday, a Merced County judge declared a mistrial after an expected witness in a three-defendant homicide trial warned the court that he had been in contact with a colleague who subsequently tested positive for COVID-19. The witness had attended the proceedings over several days before he reported feeling ill on Thursday. At least two deputy district attorneys and one defense attorney in the case have self-quarantined.
On Monday, Los Angeles County Superior Court officials announced that a judge handling a juvenile dependency calendar had developed symptoms consistent with COVID-19. The court asked the unnamed judge, who was not tested, and court staff to self-quarantine.
That announcement followed Presiding Judge Kevin Brazile's order to close the Sylmar courthouse for three days after a deputy public defender who appeared there was diagnosed with the novel coronavirus.
Brazile on Monday said that only attorneys, judges, court staff and litigants with business before the court will be allowed into the county's 38 courthouses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
4 minute readBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute readRegulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Holds New York City in Contempt Over Conditions at City Jails
- 2FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
- 3Ignore the Decline in US Rule of Law at Your Peril
- 4How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
- 5Jury Awards $1.25M to Police Officer Who Claimed Sexual Harassment
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250