Latham Lands Another Leading Williams & Connolly Partner as Nick Boyle Joins in DC
Boyle, who joins Latham less than three months after patent litigator Adam Perlman, co-chaired the unfair competition and trade secrets practice and the arbitration practice at Williams & Connolly.
April 01, 2020 at 08:42 AM
4 minute read
Williams & Connolly partner Nicholas Boyle has become the second practice leader to leave the firm for Latham & Watkins in less than three months, following the departure of Adam Perlman in January.
Boyle, based in Washington, D.C., co-chaired the unfair competition and trade secrets practice and the arbitration practice at Williams & Connolly, handling trial, appellate and arbitration matters for clients ranging from HSBC and UBS to NBA Hall of Fame coach Larry Brown. Last year, he won a record-setting $500 million copyright judgment on behalf of longtime client CoStar Group,
"Nick is one of D.C.'s strongest and most strategic commercial litigators, and we couldn't be happier to have him join our team," said Michael Egge, Latham's D.C. managing partner.
"In addition to Nick's vast experience litigating matters in federal, state, and arbitral venues around the country, his years spent as a corporate attorney are an invaluable asset in developing case strategies and resolving complex litigation matters that achieve our clients' business objectives," added Sean Berkowitz, the global head of Latham's complex commercial litigation practice.
Boyle began his career at Debevoise & Plimpton, where he practiced for four and a half years in New York and London before joining Williams & Connolly in 2001.
Boyle said his move to Latham was partly motivated by the array of practices at his new firm. WIlliams & Connolly could only address whatever litigation issues a client such as CoStar might have; at Latham, Boyle said he can keep the work in-house.
"I have a private equity client where I am doing disputes work for one of their main portfolio companies," Boyle said. "The Latham relationship allows me to talk to them about their other legal needs."
Ditto with Latham's international footprint. Williams & Connolly has only one office. Boyle said he would sometimes have to team up with local counsel in order to work on an international case. Given Latham's presence in 14 countries, Boyle is again hoping to keep the work in-house.
The difference in scale between Boyle's old and new firms is substantial. Williams & Connolly, an elite litigation-focused firm with fewer than 350 lawyers, has purposefully confined its footprint to the nation's capital. Latham, which posted global revenue of $3.76 billion last year, has 2,600 lawyers and 29 offices around the world.
Boyle said he believes both his complex commercial litigation practice and his new firm are well-situated to prosper in an economic downturn caused by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. He noted that one of the cases he just wrapped up for HSBC last year stemmed from the Great Recession of 2007-09.
"For better or worse, people litigate. When the pie shrinks, there's sometimes an uptick because people are scrambling to fight over a smaller pie," Boyle said.
Like Winston & Strawn's Daniel Blouin and the rest of the U.S. legal industry, Boyle worked from home on his first day at Latham.
"I'm hoping that picking April Fools' Day was not going to come back to haunt me," Boyle said.
While lateral partner departures from Williams & Connolly are historically rare, there have been several since the start of 2019. Early last year star appellate litigator Kannon Shanmugam left the firm for Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. Another longtime partner, Paul Dueffert, left earlier this year to start his own boutique.
Perlman, who left for Latham in mid-January, had been co-chairman of Williams & Connolly's patent litigation practice for the past five years, representing drugmakers such as Bayer and Eli Lilly in Hatch-Waxman Act litigation.
Williams & Connolly acknowledged Boyle's departure in a brief statement Wednesday morning: "We thank Nick for his years of dedicated service to our firm and our clients and wish him all the best."
|Read More
Latham Lands Pharma Patent Litigator Adam Perlman From Williams & Connolly
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250