Treasury IG Says Mnuchin, Leaning on OLC, Properly Withheld Trump's Tax Returns. Will a Judge Agree?
"We do not presume to opine on the analysis and conclusions of the OLC opinion and advice," acting Inspector General Richard Delmar wrote.
April 10, 2020 at 03:52 PM
6 minute read
The inspector general for the Treasury Department told lawmakers this week Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin properly withheld President Donald Trump's federal tax returns as he relied on an opinion from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, raising questions about whether that same legal opinion will hold up in a federal court case over the tax documents.
In a cover letter sent this week to the House Ways and Means Committee and released Friday by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, acting Inspector General Richard Delmar wrote the inquiry found the Treasury Department properly processed the request for the returns, and after seeking guidance from OLC, "determined that it was bound by that office's advice, and based on that advice determined not to provide the returns and tax information sought."
"We do not presume to opine on the analysis and conclusions of the OLC opinion and advice," Delmar wrote. "We report the Treasury decision to conform to that advice, and do not have a basis to question that decision."
The OLC opinion Mnuchin relied on found lawmakers lacked a "legitimate legislative purpose" in subpoenaing the president's federal tax returns, and therefore he could not hand over the documents.
In a five-page memo laying out the inquiry, Sally Luttrell, the assistant inspector general for investigations, wrote the investigation "did not examine the legal opinions in formulating responses to Chairman [Richard] Neal, nor attempt to identify or interpret the basis for Treasury's decisions to produce, or not produce, records." She said that one official interviewed in the process said that OLC "was consulted due to the legality of Chairman Neal's request," referring to the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee.
"It is our understanding that the underlying issue regarding production is currently in litigation," Luttrell added.
The IG report comes as the Democratic-controlled House Ways and Means Committee pursues a federal lawsuit seeking Trump's tax returns.
U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden of the District of Columbia has stayed the case pending a resolution in another House lawsuit for former White House counsel Don McGahn's testimony, as a panel opinion issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in late February found the House could not seek judicial enforcement of a subpoena.
The D.C. Circuit soon after granted an en banc rehearing of the case—set to be held later this month—and vacated that original panel opinion.
Justice Department lawyers are sure to point to the IG report in arguing the administration does not have to release the president's federal tax returns.
However, other federal judges have questioned OLC opinions, noting they do not hold the force of law. U.S. District Chief District Judge Beryl Howell of the District of Columbia raised that point last year during oral arguments in a House lawsuit seeking grand jury materials redacted from special counsel Robert Mueller III's report, as did U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero as he dismissed a lawsuit from Trump seeking to block enforcement of a subpoena for the president's tax documents.
"The court is not persuaded that it should accord the weight and legal force the president ascribes to the DOJ memos, or accept as controlling the far-reaching proposition for which they are cited in the context of the controversy at hand," Marrero wrote in the October opinion. That case is now before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Exactly how McFadden, a Trump appointee who joined the bench in 2017, will address the OLC opinion in this case is an open question.
In the memo released Friday, Luttrell wrote an official in the Treasury Department's Office of General Counsel "stated Secretary Mnuchin, informed by legal advice from OGC, made the final decision to rely on DOJ OLC's opinion."
"The same official said the DOJ OLC opinion is 'binding' because, as described, DOJ OLC is the counsel for the executive branch," the memo reads. "A second OGC official specified it was a matter of 'complying with the law' in respect to Treasury's actions to rely [on] DOJ OLC's opinion."
Luttrell's memo also said the Treasury's general counsel received an "unsolicited letter" from Trump's private attorney, William Consovoy of Consovoy McCarthy, "regarding Chairman Neal's requests for the president's tax information."
"OGC leadership stated the letter did not affect Treasury or OGC in any manner," Luttrell wrote. "In addition, all of the OGC officials we asked about, or who were aware of the letter, stated it had no effect on Treasury or OGC's processing, decisions, or responses. Treasury produced a copy of this letter from Consovoy in response to one of Chairman Neal's requests for records."
The memo said there was no indication "of any other unsolicited opinions or attempts to influence the process."
Democrats have criticized the Trump administration for its use of OLC opinions, particularly over the transmission of the whistleblower report on Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
The Trump administration later released a memo of Trump's call with Zelensky, and House Democrats released a redacted version of the whistleblower report of the call. Those Ukraine-tied allegations built the basis of Democrats' impeachment inquiry last year. The Senate acquitted Trump in early February.
Read the memo:
Read more:
Judge Links Fate of House's Bid for Trump Tax Returns to DC Circuit Ruling on McGahn
Justices Will Hear Major Challenge to Independence of Obama-Era Consumer Bureau
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SurePoint Acquires Legal Practice Management Company ZenCase
- 2Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 3The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 4Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 5As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250