The U.S. Supreme Court announced this week that it will hold oral arguments in May by teleconference and that “[d]etails will be shared as they become available.” Those details matter—they’ll help determine whether the Court’s pandemic-forced innovation will succeed.
I argued an appeal by phone last week. That gives me exactly one more such argument than many appellate lawyers—who, like me until very recently, have done zero. That doesn’t make me an expert, but my experience has led to thoughts on how the Supreme Court can make the best of this format.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
