Crossing $400M Mark in Whistleblower Awards, SEC Gives More Than $27M to Tipster
"This award marks several milestones for the program," said Jane Norberg, chief of the SEC's whistleblower office.
April 16, 2020 at 01:23 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission awarded more than $27 million on Thursday to a whistleblower credited with tipping the agency off to misconduct that played out partially overseas and providing critical leads in an investigation that resulted in a successful enforcement action.
The bounty was by far the largest of the nine awards issued so far this year, vaulting the SEC's program for rewarding tipsters past a notable milestone. In the decade since the Dodd-Frank financial reforms created the whistleblower program, the SEC has now doled out more than $400 million in awards.
"This award marks several milestones for the program," said Jane Norberg, chief of the SEC's whistleblower office. "This is the largest whistleblower award announced by the commission this year, and the sixth largest award overall since the inception of the program. This award also brings the total amount awarded to whistleblowers by the SEC over the $400 million mark."
Earlier this year, the SEC approved awards ranging from $45,000 to $7 million. In March alone, as the federal government operations were upended by the coronavirus outbreak, the SEC awarded four whistleblowers.
The SEC said that it has now awarded 79 whistleblowers, with bounties totaling about $425 million.
Following its standard practice, the SEC did not identify the whistleblower or the specific enforcement action that led to the award, although the order approving the more than $27 million bounty said that the tipster "repeatedly and strenuously" raised concerns about the misconduct internally. Under the SEC's whistleblower program, tipsters deemed worthy of awards are entitled to between 10% and 30% of the money collected in enforcement actions that result in more than $1 million in sanctions.
With the whistleblower awarded Thursday, the SEC appears to have been struck by the extent of the assistance. The award total reflected an increase from what an internal SEC panel had initially recommended for the tipster.
The SEC said it decided to elevate the bounty following a review of the "administrative record," which revealed a number of factors that favored a higher bounty, including the repeated efforts to blow the whistle internally. The SEC also highlighted the "substantial amount of ongoing assistance and cooperation," noting that the whistleblower met "numerous times" with enforcement staff and provided "critical investigative leads" that advanced the investigation while saving the commission time.
"This order provides a road map for whistleblowers to get a high award percentage: provide original information and substantial ongoing assistance to the SEC, including solid investigate leads," said Jason Zuckerman, a whistleblower lawyer at Washington-based Zuckerman Law.
"It also shows why companies act at their peril when they ignore internal whistleblower disclosures. This whistleblower reported internally before disclosing information to the SEC that apparently resulted in a significant enforcement action."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250