Arnold & Porter Resists Pay Cuts as COVID-19 Crisis Follows Revenue Dip
Grappling with the pandemic in the wake of flat or declining 2019 finances, the firm has held off from announcing furloughs, layoffs or compensation cuts.
April 17, 2020 at 06:00 PM
6 minute read
Responding to the coronavirus crisis, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer said it will transform its summer associate program into a five-week remote program and is takings steps to aggressively manage expenses—without making pay cuts.
No large cost-cutting measures at Arnold & Porter have been publicly reported. The Am Law 50 firm's chairman, Richard Alexander, said in a statement it has "not announced any changes to our staffing levels or compensation." A spokeswoman confirmed late in the week that no furloughs, layoffs or compensation cuts had been made among staff and attorneys, and there had been no reductions in partner draws or distributions.
However, Alexander said the firm is "continuing to watch the market very closely and taking appropriate steps in response, including aggressively managing the expenses of the firm." When asked what expenses the firm was managing, the spokeswoman cited costs related to travel, in-person training, "and other operational expenditures."
"Our focus remains on the health and well-being of our colleagues while continuing to serve our clients" to help them weather the crisis, said Alexander in his statement.
In holding a remote summer associate program, Arnold & Porter joins others in the approach, including Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, which has announced a five-week virtual arrangement. DLA Piper has also been weighing whether to hold a five-week program remotely. Arnold & Porter said it expects all 2Ls will receive offers to join the firm as first-year associates in 2021.
|Revenue, Partner Profits Inch Down
Last year, Arnold & Porter's revenue contracted about 1% to $951.9 million. With a 2% drop in attorney head count, the firm's revenue per lawyer rose just over 1% to $1.036 million.
The total net income dropped 4% to $368.16 million, even with four fewer equity partners. Profits per partner dipped 2.8% to $1.2 million. But its profit margin, while seeing a small dip last year, remained relatively high in 2019 at 39%.
Alexander, in a late March interview about the firm's financial performance, said the partnership in 2019 continued to "successfully leverage" the integration of the Arnold & Porter and Kaye Scholer firms, which merged in 2017, leading to expanding work for clients and combined strengths that brought in new clients.
But he pointed to several factors that impaired the firm's revenue growth last year, including a lax regulatory environment, a collections shortfall and pricing pressures.
Arnold & Porter has a substantial regulatory practice, which he called a "market differentiator."
"There is no question that the current administration's focus on deregulation has had an impact on those practices," he said. "When you have wholesale government agencies who are no longer enforcing certain parts of the federal regulatory apparatus that we have strong practices in, that's going to have an impact."
Also, he said the firm saw a "slight shortfall" on its collections at the end of 2019, which he said was a matter of timing.
He added the firm was also not immune to pricing pressures. The firm's clients include Fortune 50 and 100 corporations. "They give us their most important work and they also are very, very demanding from a pricing standpoint," Alexander said.
Meanwhile, when looking at year-over-year changes, he said Arnold & Porter had a "very significant" non-litigation matter that ended in late 2018, declining to specify the matter. "It takes some time to ramp that work back up," he said.
On 2020, he said, while the firm was trying to conduct business as usual, "we are also doing a lot of contingency planning." But he pointed to 2008, when many law firms were laying off lawyers during the Great Recession. Arnold & Porter "did none of that and we managed through that quite successfully. That's my focus. My focus is on our clients and our people and all the other important constituent relationships we have," he said.
He said it was incumbent on law firm leadership to conduct stress testing, to be transparent with lenders, partners and associates, to recognize when demand changes in pockets of the firm and to be nimble in utilizing resources
The last few weeks had been "among the busiest" at the firm, he said in the late March interview, citing the need for counseling on the stimulus legislation and demand for restructuring, finance and in life sciences and health care practices.
"The work in 2020 is going to shift," he said. "All law firms are going to experience this, and I think some firms will be resilient because of the diversification of their practice."
The firm's lawyers are now in their fourth year after the merger of New York-based Kaye Scholer and Washington, D.C.-based Arnold Porter. Alexander said the merger brought "expanded product offerings to our clients," which had been "a home run" and the firm had been able to hire talent that it otherwise wouldn't have been able to bring in.
|Looking Ahead
While the combined firm has had flat revenue growth in its first few years, Alexander said it has done a "done a good job these three years of setting the building blocks."
Now, he said, "what we need to do is take what we have and to leverage it and to continue to grow our practice, and I feel like we've done the hard blocking and tackling necessary to put us in a good position."
He also acknowledged that there's still more to be done to maximize the benefits of the firm's merger. Three years later, Arnold & Porter's leadership wants to make sure there's "depth of practice" throughout all offices and wants to build its transactional group. "We have been spending a lot of time focusing on the growth of our offices outside New York and Washington, and we've been actively involved in lateral discussions," he said.
Arnold & Porter's equity partnership has grown smaller since the merger, from 322 partners in 2017 to 305 last year. Alexander cited a number of factors, including retirements. "It's a combination of continuing to deal with the life cycle of people and continuing to hold our partners to a high standard and then investing in the next generation," he said, adding the firm has promoted 36 new partners since the combination.
Arnold & Porter scored high profile courtroom wins last year, while working on noteworthy deals, especially in the health care industry. For instance, the firm represented Alcon Laboratories, a division of longtime client Novartis, in its $285 million acquisition of PowerVision Inc., a medical device development company.
Meanwhile, the firm won attention for helping overturn Pennsylvania's gerrymandered legislative map and convincing the U.S. Supreme Court to halt the Trump administration's attempt to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250