Heart-Monitoring Patent Gives Life to New Section 101 Dispute
Judges for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit disagree whether prior art outside the prosecution history should be consulted when deciding if a patent is directed to a longstanding "abstract idea."
April 17, 2020 at 08:20 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has revived a long-running patent infringement fight between providers of ambulatory cardiac monitoring systems. Along the way it's opened a new front in the ongoing debate over how to properly analyze Section 101 defenses.
The court found that a CardioNet Inc. patent on an automated process for identifying atrial fibrillation and flutter, and distinguishing them from more benign forms of cardiac arrhythmia, is eligible for patent protection.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 5'You Are Not Alone': 120 Sex Assault Victims Plan to Sue Sean 'Diddy' Combs
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250