Weil Adds Longtime FTC Mergers Lawyer as Partner in DC
Michael Moiseyev's experience, including overseeing more than 100 merger reviews and working with global competition regulators, will prove useful to clients, Weil said.
April 27, 2020 at 12:35 PM
3 minute read
Michael Moiseyev, who spent three decades at the Federal Trade Commission and most recently focused on vetting proposed mergers in health care and other industries, has moved to Weil, Gotshal & Manges as a partner.
Moiseyev, who spent over 16 years as the head of the Mergers I division of the FTC's Bureau of Competition until earlier this year, started at Weil on Monday. Weil said Moiseyev's experience, including overseeing more than 100 merger reviews and working with competition regulators in Europe, the U.K. and Canada, will prove useful to clients.
He said in an interview that his move to a partner post at Weil amounts to a reunion with Steven Newborn, who leads the firm's antitrust and competition practice, and several other old colleagues. Newborn was a director of litigation at the FTC's Bureau of Competition until 1994.
"I have known Weil for actually quite some time," he said. "I've been practicing merger law for the government for 30 years, and Weil has been a player in the merger field for as long as I've been active in it."
The Mergers I division is responsible for assessing proposed transactions in drug manufacturing and distribution, medical devices and consumer health products, along with nonhealth-related fields such as defense and technology, according to the FTC's website. Dan Zach, formerly a deputy of Moiseyev's, is now leading the division in an acting capacity, the FTC said in a blog post.
One of Moiseyev's big matters was an action against Otto Bock, which manufactures high-tech prosthetic knees and was found by the FTC to have hindered competition with its acquisition of a competitor, Freedom Innovations. He also helped oversee the FTC's $100 million settlement with pharma giant Mallinckrodt over specialty drug Acthar.
While big tech platforms such as Amazon and Facebook have taken center stage in the revived public discourse around mergers and competition, Moiseyev said a whole range of industries need to be prepared to address regulators. "In general, the types of issues that the government is interested in are broadening and the types of arguments that need to be brought to bear are different now than they were five years ago," he said.
Moiseyev added that the global scope of antitrust review was a prominent part of his government work and he anticipated that it would be at Weil, too
Weil's website lists 47 people with antitrust M&A and litigation capabilities, with more than half of them in its Washington, D.C., office.
Moiseyev's move to Weil comes shortly after Hunton Andrews Kurth announced the arrival of Kevin Hahm, who was an assistant director in the Mergers IV division.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute read‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250