While 'Praying for a Pardon,' Roger Stone Appeals His Conviction to the DC Circuit
Stone recently hired appellate lawyer Paul Kamenar, who represented his associate Andrew Miller.
April 30, 2020 at 10:13 AM
4 minute read
Roger Stone on Thursday said he is appealing his case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, shortly before he could be called in to report to federal prison.
He and his attorney Seth Ginsberg filed the notice of appeal in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, saying he was appealing the judgment in his criminal case, his sentence and U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson's denial of Stone's motion for a new trial.
Stone was convicted by a federal jury in November on charges of lying to the House Intelligence Committee during its Russia probe, as well as impeding the investigation and witness tampering. Jackson in February sentenced Stone to 40 months in prison, pending her ruling on his motion for a new trial.
He also has recently hired Paul Kamenar, an appellate attorney who represented Stone associate Andrew Miller in the legal fight against a subpoena for Miller's grand jury testimony in the federal investigation into Stone.
Kamenar argued special counsel Robert Mueller III's appointment was unconstitutional because he should have been Senate confirmed, an argument rejected by Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, who found Miller to be in contempt.
Howell stayed her ruling while the case went up on appeal to the D.C. Circuit. But after the circuit ruled against Miller and later declined to rehear the case, the Stone associate agreed to end the 10-month legal battle and testify before the grand jury in May 2019, months after Stone was indicted and during the final days of the Mueller probe.
Stone has said he is "praying for a pardon" from President Donald Trump, but that he would appeal his conviction if he had to. The motion to appeal comes after documents were released in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn—who previously pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators—about FBI officials' handling of Flynn's questioning while he was under investigation. Tweets by Trump about those documents have inflamed speculation that Trump could pardon Flynn.
Stone has also recently expressed some frustration with his legal team. Stone told his friend, Frank Morano on the podcast "Morano Whenever," last week that he believed he would have been better off if he had represented himself during the trial and floated the idea of filing an ineffective counsel claim.
"In the judge's most recent decision, she basically said, 'Your lawyers should have known that.' I think she just bolstered such a claim," Stone said at the time.
Stone has been represented by a team of Fort Lauderdale attorneys, including past Supreme Court advocate Bruce Rogow and Robert Buschel, throughout his criminal case.
Stone also tapped Ginsberg earlier this year, as he filed a motion for a new trial alleging juror bias and misconduct.
The lawyers pointed to social media posts made by the jury's forewoman, Tomeka Hart—who identified herself after the four prosecutors who secured Stone's conviction dropped from the case after Main Justice interference in Stone's sentencing recommendation—alleging that she was biased against Stone.
Jackson, the judge in Stone's case, earlier this month denied Stone's motion and called it a "tower of indignation." She found Hart had been truthful on her juror questionnaire and was not biased against Stone during the proceedings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250