Mayer Brown
"[Pro bono work is] a chance to make courts, colleagues and the public see issues in a new way," says Mayer Brown partner Ward Johnson.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
4 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service. Mayer Brown has long deployed its resources to confront systemic problems around the world where it can have a major impact. In addition to supporting large-scale projects, including the firm's most recent work challenging the administration's immigration policies, the firm also encourages lawyers to pursue individual cases and issues of importance to them. These cases can change people's lives and have a ripple effect that allows individuals, families and communities to thrive and succeed. —Marcia Maack
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome. 1) We won freedom for a client who had served 23 years of a life sentence for joyriding based on California's three strikes law. Ken Oliver had been forced to serve eight years in solitary confinement—simply for reading a classic novel wrongly deemed "gang material." Working with Stanford Law School's Three Strikes Project, we won [Oliver's] release from prison in June 2019 and a hefty settlement from California's Department of Corrections. —Ward Johnson
2) Mayer Brown challenged the federal government's termination of "temporary protected status" (TPS) for Haiti, which was granted after a devastating 2010 earthquake and which has allowed nearly 60,000 Haitians to live and work lawfully in the United States. A team of 60 lawyers and staff completed discovery and trial preparation in a compressed period and then presented the case at a four-day hearing, which resulted in a 145-page ruling granting a preliminary injunction in April 2019. —Miriam Nemetz
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work? Giving our client his freedom. Oliver, who memorized the Rutter Guide cover to cover while he was in solitary, now works as a paralegal at Legal Services for Prisoners with Children and has recently testified before the California State Senate. His case exposed ongoing injustices from the three strikes law. —Ward Johnson
Our victory in the Haiti TPS litigation meant that 59,000 Haitians and their children were able to stay in the U.S. Many of the children are U.S. citizens who might have sustained severe harm had they been forced to remain here without their parents or return to Haiti before it was safe to do so. —Miriam Nemetz
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on? Mayer Brown is involved in several other high-impact cases. Most recently, the firm stood up for asylum seekers on the U.S.-Mexico border and challenged a new administration policy that effectively stripped these asylum seekers of their right to access the U.S. asylum process. In November 2019, the firm secured a preliminary injunction, which will ensure that approximately 26,000 migrants will have a chance to have their asylum claims heard.
In December 2019, we secured a preliminary nationwide injunction against a proposed [United States Citizenship and Immigration Services] rule that made it harder for immigrants to qualify for fee waivers in the naturalization process. This victory is crucial for hundreds of thousands of green card holders and upholds the principle that the U.S. is welcoming of all immigrants. —Marcia Maack
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer? It's a chance to make courts, colleagues and the public see issues in a new way. It's also a chance to bring in junior lawyers who—often for the first time—visit a client in prison, meet other prisoners and see a side of the justice system that they don't ordinarily see. —Ward Johnson
Responses submitted by Marcia Maack, director of pro bono activities, and partners Ward Johnson and Miriam Nemetz.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1European, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
- 2UPS Agrees to $45M Settlement With SEC Over Valuation Claim
- 3For Midsize Law Firms, Curbing Boys-Club Culture Starts with Diversity at the Top
- 4Southern California Law Firms Boast Industry-Leading Revenue, Demand Through Q3
- 5AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250