McDermott Practice Head Says Lower Rates Sparked Move to Snell & Wilmer
Trademark and IP litigators John Dabney, Richard Kim and Mary Hallerman will be Phoenix-based Snell & Wilmer's first full-time partners in Washington, D.C.
May 01, 2020 at 11:14 AM
4 minute read
Phoenix-founded Snell & Wilmer added three former McDermott Will & Emery partners to its intellectual property and technology group this week, including one who led the trademark litigation practice at the much-larger McDermott.
John Dabney, Richard Kim and Mary Hallerman are each joining Snell as partners in Washington, D.C., becoming the firm's first full-time resident partners there. Dabney spent nearly 20 years at McDermott, where he led the trademark litigation practice for the past decade, he said. He has been lead counsel in more than 100 federal court actions, according to Snell.
Dabney has represented brands such as candy company Mars Inc., meat processor and marketer Tyson Foods, the AARP and multiple microbreweries, including Dogfish Head Brewery and Brooklyn Brewery, according to his McDermott biography.
He said the move happened quickly, especially compared to the multimonth process lateral moves often require.
"We had a friend at Snell who practices in our area, and he said how happy he was there," Dabney said. "We quickly got to meet the managing partner and some others and were blown away by them. The whole process took about four to six weeks."
McDermott, which announced austerity measures last week to deal with economic fallout from COVID-19, is coming off a strong 2019 that saw the firm grow revenue by 11% to $1.17 billion while equity partner payouts passed the $2 million mark.
But Dabney said that, in the end, the firm's financial model was not a match for his and his team's practice.
"When you have to work at a rate of $1,200 or $1,300 per hour, every single minute of your day is highly scrutinized," Dabney said. "It is more enjoyable to work at a lower rate and be able to look your client in the eye when you tell them what [the rate] is."
He said the fees he'll be able to charge at Snell, a Second Hundred firm with revenues of about $270 million 2019, will allow his team to keep many existing clients as well as regain some they'd lost previously, which Dabney attributed to rate pressures.
"My compensation went up 25% this year," Dabney said. "But I wouldn't have stayed, even if they doubled it."
Kim, who also had been at McDermott for close to two decades, works on trademark prosecution, counseling, licensing and litigation matters, Snell said. Kim carved out a niche for himself in the alcoholic beverage industry, representing brands such as the Absolut Co, Malibu Rum, Kahlua, Chivas Brothers, Beefeater, Glenlivet, Plymouth Gin, Sapporo USA, Newcastle Brown Ale and Amstel Light, according to his former McDermott biography.
Hallerman, who was at McDermott for a little under 10 years, works on trademark, trade dress, false advertising and copyright litigation issues, according to Snell. She has represented confectioner Lotte Confectionery Co. and Lotte International America Corp., Oregon Brewery Co. and Mars Petcare, among others.
Snell saw modest growth in 2019, growing revenue by 3% and partner profits by 2%. While adding three partners in D.C., the firm lost one in Salt Lake City last week, as former partner Michael Gehret moved over to Armstrong Teasdale.
McDermott, for its part, added four former DLA Piper tax attorneys to its Miami office on April 7.
"The addition of John, Richard and Mary to our team greatly strengthens our capabilities and reach in the Washington, D.C., market," Howard Sobelman, co-chair of Snell's intellectual property and technology group, said in a statement. "Their extensive experience in IP litigation, prosecution and counseling adds a critical dimension to our firm's overall growth strategy in the intellectual property space."
In a statement, McDermott said the firm wishes the trio the best at their new firm.
|Read More
DLA Piper Cross-Border Tax Group Jumps to McDermott in Miami
Snell & Wilmer Gobbles Up West Coast Finance Boutique
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
- 2Attorney Sanctioned for Not Exercising Ordinary Care: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 3$1.9M Settlement Approved in Class Suit Over Vacant Property Fees
- 4Former Wamco Exec Charged With $600M 'Cherry-Picking' Fraud
- 5Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250