Baker Botts
Providing our client with unprecedented, well-deserved compensation for his [more than] 12 years of wrongful imprisonment and helping him get back on his feet more than justified the 750 pro bono hours we dedicated to this client.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
We relentlessly pursue justice for every client and advocate for individuals and communities who would otherwise be lost in our complex legal system. We marshal our collective resources to protect and intercede on behalf of those who are denied a persecution-free existence in their own country or in ours, and we assist where the legal system fails. We provide 30,000-plus hours of pro bono legal services annually, valued equally with that of fee-paying clients.
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome.
A $900,000 exoneration compensation. We obtained $900,000-plus for a homeless client wrongfully imprisoned for 12 years—the first time in 15 years that Maryland compensated an exoneree. Our client was exonerated with nothing but $4 for bus fare. After learning of his post-exoneration struggles with homelessness and frequent hospital visits after being assaulted, we took up the effort to get him compensation, developing a damage calculation with no legal precedent. Our client was first to file under Maryland's law. We ran a publicity campaign that inspired 49 Maryland delegates to support our effort.
Transgender asylum. We obtained asylum for a 19-year-old transgender woman who suffered physical and sexual abuse on account of her gender identity. Our client fled Honduras under threat of death. In only six weeks, we retained expert witnesses, compiled a 1,800-plus-page evidentiary record, drafted a pre-hearing brief, and made many 260-mile round trips for client meetings.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work?
Exoneration. Providing our client with unprecedented, well-deserved compensation for his 12-plus years of wrongful imprisonment and helping him get back on his feet more than justified the 750 pro bono hours we dedicated to this client.
Asylum. Thanks to the dedication of 18 timekeepers from five offices, our client—the fourth transgender woman we have successfully defended since 2017—can now live her life with the protections granted to asylees in the United States.
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on?
Our lawyers continue their work on pro bono cases that run the gamut from the everyday matters including estate planning, family law, property and tax issues, to more complex matters, including immigration and asylum, death penalty appeals, nonprofit work, and intellectual property matters in partnership with our 20-plus pro bono referral organizations firmwide.
Current notable pro bono matters include our work on behalf of a client seeking asylum under the Convention Against Torture and our work for the only "prepared and perishable" food rescue organization in Houston.
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
As lawyers, we occupy a unique role in society by ensuring access to justice for the most vulnerable and underserved in our communities and worldwide. We consider it a moral imperative to use our skills to give back to the communities that need us most.
Keri Brown, partner and pro bono chair at Baker Botts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
GOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250