Covington & Burling
In our country, there is a large "justice gap," with many people needing legal help, but unable to afford counsel.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Covington regards pro bono service as a professional obligation of each firm lawyer—with the privilege we all have as lawyers, comes a responsibility to give back. Covington seeks input from each individual lawyer about pro bono work that would best serve the public good. Our pro bono program is therefore voluntary, diverse and driven by our lawyers' interests, though anchored in increasing access to justice for economically disadvantaged individuals.
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome.
After an eight-day bench trial, a diverse Covington team secured a nationwide injunction prohibiting the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census. The Commerce Secretary's decision threatened a disproportionate undercount of certain demographic groups, leading to unequal legislative representation and unfair reductions in federal funding. Coordinating with parallel New York and California litigation, we played a key role in reversing the secretary's ill-conceived and unlawful action and protecting the integrity of the census.
We were also thrilled to represent a class of veterans before the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, in a case in which, for the first time in its history, the court certified a class action and granted classwide relief to our clients, veterans experiencing inexcusable delays by the VA in processing appeals of benefit denials. Covington brought this historic action, Godsey v. Wilkie, with the National Veterans Legal Services Program.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work?
The census case had momentous national significance on several levels: fair apportionment and democratic institutions, protecting the Census Bureau against partisan interference and preserving the rule of law. Accomplishing our team's mission was deeply rewarding.
Achieving a historic class certification on behalf of veterans ensured that the benefit claims of the over 2,000 class members did not forever remain in procedural limbo. The decision is favorable precedent for future class claims.
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on?
A significant portion of Covington's pro bono work centers around providing counsel to those unable to afford representation. In 2019, Covington celebrated the 50th anniversary of our first-of-its-kind civil legal aid rotation program, through which the firm has loaned over 300 associates to work for six-month stints at local legal aid organizations providing housing and family court representation. In 2019, our criminal justice practice helped over 100 individuals in criminal cases and related civil rights cases. Our criminal justice docket also included dozens of impact matters, including the successful settlement of a decades-long challenge to juvenile justice practices in D.C.
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
In our country, there is a large "justice gap," with many people needing legal help, but unable to afford counsel. Law firms can help close this gap, particularly in cases requiring substantial expertise and resources. It is a privilege to work in a firm that understands the importance of this responsibility.
Responses submitted by Alan Pemberton, co-chair of the public service committee at Covington & Burling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readDC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
3 minute read4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
3 minute readAm Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250