Covington & Burling
In our country, there is a large "justice gap," with many people needing legal help, but unable to afford counsel.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Covington regards pro bono service as a professional obligation of each firm lawyer—with the privilege we all have as lawyers, comes a responsibility to give back. Covington seeks input from each individual lawyer about pro bono work that would best serve the public good. Our pro bono program is therefore voluntary, diverse and driven by our lawyers' interests, though anchored in increasing access to justice for economically disadvantaged individuals.
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome.
After an eight-day bench trial, a diverse Covington team secured a nationwide injunction prohibiting the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census. The Commerce Secretary's decision threatened a disproportionate undercount of certain demographic groups, leading to unequal legislative representation and unfair reductions in federal funding. Coordinating with parallel New York and California litigation, we played a key role in reversing the secretary's ill-conceived and unlawful action and protecting the integrity of the census.
We were also thrilled to represent a class of veterans before the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, in a case in which, for the first time in its history, the court certified a class action and granted classwide relief to our clients, veterans experiencing inexcusable delays by the VA in processing appeals of benefit denials. Covington brought this historic action, Godsey v. Wilkie, with the National Veterans Legal Services Program.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work?
The census case had momentous national significance on several levels: fair apportionment and democratic institutions, protecting the Census Bureau against partisan interference and preserving the rule of law. Accomplishing our team's mission was deeply rewarding.
Achieving a historic class certification on behalf of veterans ensured that the benefit claims of the over 2,000 class members did not forever remain in procedural limbo. The decision is favorable precedent for future class claims.
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on?
A significant portion of Covington's pro bono work centers around providing counsel to those unable to afford representation. In 2019, Covington celebrated the 50th anniversary of our first-of-its-kind civil legal aid rotation program, through which the firm has loaned over 300 associates to work for six-month stints at local legal aid organizations providing housing and family court representation. In 2019, our criminal justice practice helped over 100 individuals in criminal cases and related civil rights cases. Our criminal justice docket also included dozens of impact matters, including the successful settlement of a decades-long challenge to juvenile justice practices in D.C.
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
In our country, there is a large "justice gap," with many people needing legal help, but unable to afford counsel. Law firms can help close this gap, particularly in cases requiring substantial expertise and resources. It is a privilege to work in a firm that understands the importance of this responsibility.
Responses submitted by Alan Pemberton, co-chair of the public service committee at Covington & Burling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt Advisory Committee Inches Forward on Transparency in Litigation Financing
Assistant Solicitor General Heads to Paul Hastings to Co-Chair Appellate Practice
3 minute readWave of Office Closures Highlights the Weighty Stakes Surrounding Law Firm Growth
7 minute readBig Law Making Top IP Partner Hires as 'Demand Far Outweighs Supply' of First-Chair Patent Litigators
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250