Covington & Burling
In our country, there is a large "justice gap," with many people needing legal help, but unable to afford counsel.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Covington regards pro bono service as a professional obligation of each firm lawyer—with the privilege we all have as lawyers, comes a responsibility to give back. Covington seeks input from each individual lawyer about pro bono work that would best serve the public good. Our pro bono program is therefore voluntary, diverse and driven by our lawyers' interests, though anchored in increasing access to justice for economically disadvantaged individuals.
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome.
After an eight-day bench trial, a diverse Covington team secured a nationwide injunction prohibiting the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census. The Commerce Secretary's decision threatened a disproportionate undercount of certain demographic groups, leading to unequal legislative representation and unfair reductions in federal funding. Coordinating with parallel New York and California litigation, we played a key role in reversing the secretary's ill-conceived and unlawful action and protecting the integrity of the census.
We were also thrilled to represent a class of veterans before the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, in a case in which, for the first time in its history, the court certified a class action and granted classwide relief to our clients, veterans experiencing inexcusable delays by the VA in processing appeals of benefit denials. Covington brought this historic action, Godsey v. Wilkie, with the National Veterans Legal Services Program.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work?
The census case had momentous national significance on several levels: fair apportionment and democratic institutions, protecting the Census Bureau against partisan interference and preserving the rule of law. Accomplishing our team's mission was deeply rewarding.
Achieving a historic class certification on behalf of veterans ensured that the benefit claims of the over 2,000 class members did not forever remain in procedural limbo. The decision is favorable precedent for future class claims.
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on?
A significant portion of Covington's pro bono work centers around providing counsel to those unable to afford representation. In 2019, Covington celebrated the 50th anniversary of our first-of-its-kind civil legal aid rotation program, through which the firm has loaned over 300 associates to work for six-month stints at local legal aid organizations providing housing and family court representation. In 2019, our criminal justice practice helped over 100 individuals in criminal cases and related civil rights cases. Our criminal justice docket also included dozens of impact matters, including the successful settlement of a decades-long challenge to juvenile justice practices in D.C.
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
In our country, there is a large "justice gap," with many people needing legal help, but unable to afford counsel. Law firms can help close this gap, particularly in cases requiring substantial expertise and resources. It is a privilege to work in a firm that understands the importance of this responsibility.
Responses submitted by Alan Pemberton, co-chair of the public service committee at Covington & Burling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute read‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250