Dechert
Our pro bono program allows me to represent people in incredibly worthy causes who would not otherwise have a voice.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
4 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Dechert lawyers approach pro bono with the same energy, enthusiasm and resources as work for commercial clients. We strive to find projects that make a difference and that match our lawyers' personal interests and the needs of the community. Headline initiatives focus on protecting the rights to vote, to freedom of speech and to live free from discrimination, violence and persecution. Globally, our lawyers performed over 90,000 pro bono hours last year, equivalent to 5.5% of billable hours.
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome.
Pro bono client Shaurn Thomas spent 24 years in prison for a murder he did not commit. Despite questionable witnesses and evidence concealed from the defense, he was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole in 1994. Working alongside the Pennsylvania Innocence Project, I unearthed a lab report that had not been provided to Thomas' original defense team. Additional evidence later came to light strengthening Thomas' alibi and his conviction was subsequently vacated. Shortly after, Dechert filed a civil rights action against the city of Philadelphia and two of its detectives, which in December 2019 led to a $4.15 million settlement, the largest Philadelphia has ever paid in a non-DNA exoneration case.
More recently, we won freedom for pro bono client Willie Veasy, who was also serving a life sentence for a murder conviction based largely on a false confession that Veasy said had been fabricated by Philadelphia detectives. We scoured police files and trial transcripts from the Thomas case, finding a pattern of coerced false confessions and witness statements, many involving the same detectives who convicted both Veasy and Thomas. We filed for relief, and the Philadelphia District Attorney's Conviction Integrity Unit agreed that Veasy was wrongly convicted. As a result, the court vacated the conviction, allowing him to walk free.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work?
The eight years I worked on the Thomas case literally changed my life. It brought the two of us so close that we became best friends. We still speak every day. And now Veasy is another happy addition to my family's lives and to our lives at Dechert. Both are frequent visitors to Dechert's Philadelphia office, where they are extremely popular. The Thomas case also convinced me that freeing the innocent is a moral imperative. Witnessing the incredibly positive impact that our work has had on the lives and families of these two men moves all of us. It is simply the most satisfying work I have ever accomplished.
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on?
Among notable voting rights cases, we successfully challenged a New York state law that removed the names of individuals from the poll book if they failed to return just one piece of election mail. In January, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York held that New York state's refusal to include "inactive" voters on poll ledgers, which had disenfranchised tens of thousands of voters, violated the National Voter Registration Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Elsewhere, we challenged the criminalization of the homeless in Texas and litigated to prevent the deportation of 4,000 Liberians, winning time for lawmakers to craft a legislative solution allowing them to remain permanently. Further afield, we also helped win freedom for a Mauritanian accountant sentenced to death by firing squad for writing a Facebook post.
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
Our pro bono program allows me to represent people in incredibly worthy causes who would not otherwise have a voice. Thomas and Veasy spent decades in prison not because they were guilty but because they were poor. Without pro bono work, innocent people would quite simply die in prison.
Responses submitted by James Figorski, senior staff attorney of the litigation practice group at in Dechert.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute read‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250