Fish & Richardson
As a lawyer, I am proud that my pro bono contributions help to level the playing field between those with many resources and those who, increasingly, are struggling.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
At Fish, pro bono work is an integral part of our culture, and we strongly encourage all our attorneys to take on pro bono matters as a part of their professional lives. We back up this commitment by providing our attorneys with full hours credit for approved pro bono matters, and by assigning a principal-level attorney in each of our U.S. offices with the task of seeking out and publicizing local pro bono opportunities.
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome.
I'm proud of our representation of plaintiff Jose Alfaro, a teen survivor of sex trafficking, in Alfaro v. Gandy (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas) that resulted in a $1.4 million civil award for Alfaro. We filed the lawsuit under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 and dedicated nearly 200 pro bono hours to the case. We obtained summary judgment in March 2019, with compensatory and punitive damages awarded in April 2019. We also received and donated $191,374 in post-judgment attorney fees in 2019 in OCA-Greater Houston v. State of Texas (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas/U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit), our pro bono victory safeguarding the voting rights of individuals with limited English proficiency—a win with enormous implications in the 2020 elections. We had successfully argued that a Texas Election Code provision preventing voters from using the interpreter of their choice during the voting process violated Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work?
The most satisfying part was donating our $191,374 fee award in the Texas voting rights case to various legal aid organizations and to the University of Texas Law School to endow the Mallika Das Scholarship in Voting Rights, which provides financial aid to law students who have a demonstrated interest in voting rights. The plaintiff, Mallika Das, passed away during the lawsuit, but the scholarship is a fitting tribute to her courage and her life.
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on?
Fish is responding to the needs of low-income people arising out of the COVID-19 pandemic by advocating for the homeless, staffing a remote asylum clinic, and assisting tenants with evictions that started during the pandemic.
Fish also represents Central American refugees fleeing persecution who were forcibly sent from the U.S. to Mexico to await their asylum hearings. The refugees are in very dangerous situations because of a policy that violates U.S. and international law.
Additionally, Fish just won the right for Minnesota voters with disabilities or language barriers to get assistance from the person of their choice at the polls.
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
Pro bono matters to me because everyone deserves equal access to justice, no matter the ability to pay for legal services. As a lawyer, I am proud that my pro bono contributions help to level the playing field between those with many resources and those who, increasingly, are struggling.
Responses submitted by Lawrence Kolodney, principal and pro bono program chair at Fish & Richardson.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState High Court Bucks Trend Favoring Insurers, Sides With Restaurants Seeking COVID-19 Coverage
High Verdicts and Venue Rule Land Pa. Courts on Top of 'Judicial Hellhole' List
5 minute read'Health Care Behemoth'?: DOJ Seeks Injunction Blocking $3.3B UnitedHealth Merger Proposal
3 minute readBack-To-Back Hurricanes' Impact on Florida Legal Work Will Go Beyond Usual Suspects
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250