Hogan Lovells
In representing the Ujenzi Charitable Trust, we helped make significant strides in ensuring the health and well-being of all.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Social justice and equality are integral to our firm's history. In the wake of the Civil Rights Movement, our law firm was the first to create a stand-alone pro bono practice—50 years ago, in 1970—to better meet the needs of our community. Since then, we've devoted more than 2 million pro bono hours to those in need and won more than 80 awards for our efforts.
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome.
1) After more than four years of hard-fought litigation, we achieved a complete victory in a lawsuit challenging the use of automatic solitary confinement on death-row inmates in Virginia. Before we filed suit, these inmates spent 23-24 hours per day in a 71-square-foot cell. They were caged during their limited outdoor time and only permitted three 10-minute showers per week. Despite the fact that conditions greatly improved after we sued, our team nonetheless pursued the matter through appeal to ensure that Virginia could never return to such appalling conditions.
2) Post-partum hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality. One safe and efficacious treatment is a uterine balloon tamponade (UBT), but the procedure is typically cost-prohibitive in developing countries. Over a two-year period, we assisted Ujenzi Charitable Trust with a comprehensive regulatory strategy, allowing the client to broadly distribute a new $5 UBT made with off-the-shelf, [Food and Drug Administration]-approved components.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work?
Both of these projects align with our firm's global citizenship strategy and our commitment to the [United Nations] Sustainable Development Goals. In Porter v. Clarke, we successfully asserted that the basic human rights of an individual don't end simply because he has been convicted of a crime. In representing the Ujenzi Charitable Trust, we helped make significant strides in ensuring the health and well-being of all.
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on?
Our pro bono lawyers are working to address the COVID-19 crisis from every angle. Among other virus-related matters, we are:
• Representing several clients in donating, securing, or manufacturing personal protective equipment and other medical supplies.
• Conducting virtual consultations for nonprofits and struggling small businesses regarding potential federal relief benefits.
• Creating a digital tool to make unemployment benefits more understandable and accessible to those who qualify.
• Pursuing initiatives in New York and D.C. to assist victims of domestic violence, many of whom are trapped at home with their abusers.
• Working toward the compassionate release of certain criminal offenders.
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
We are privileged to be able to pursue careers where we are well-compensated to apply our legal skills. We are ethically and morally obligated to do what we can to use these talents to better the lives and circumstances of those less fortunate.
Responses submitted by T. Clark Weymouth, partner at Hogan Lovells.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
GOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250