Jenner & Block
Pro bono is at the very core of the firm. Representing those without the resources to protect themselves reminds us that the work we do can make all the difference in the world.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Pro bono is a core value of our firm, and has been for many decades. Our commitment to serve our communities is all the more important to us in these challenging times. On matters large and small, we provide critical legal services to those most in need, giving an important voice to those without access to justice. We partner with many clients who share our values towards community and public service.
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome.
Led by Ian Heath Gershengorn, Jenner & Block helped ensure that tens of thousands of Medicaid recipients in Kentucky and Arkansas wouldn't lose health insurance as a result of new restrictions on eligibility and coverage, including work requirements and lock-outs. We won in district court in March 2019. In February 2020, the [U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia] unanimously affirmed, holding that the federal government failed to justify allowing those states to impose a work requirement as a condition of eligibility for Medicaid benefits.
We also protected the rights of two civilian lawyers who withdrew from representing an alleged terrorist at [Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp] after they discovered governmental intrusions into protected attorney-client communications. The lawyers, threatened with contempt and arrest for attempting to resign from the case on ethical grounds, were fully vindicated in an April 2019 D.C. Circuit decision, in which all the orders and rulings entered by the now-retired military judge and the Court of Military Commission Review were vacated.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work?
It is extremely rewarding to use our skills to help change the lives of individuals whose voices are not always heard. The Medicaid victory, in particular, is one in which tens of thousands of Americans can now continue to have access to health coverage and health care. The decision made clear that the administration cannot simply ignore the devastating real-world consequences of its policies.
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on?
We continue our core pro bono work in such matters as criminal, LGBTQ and civil rights. Through our partnerships with existing and new clients, we have multiplied our efforts in times of crisis. Our lawyers have been working with the City Bar Justice Center's Legal Hotline to prepare training materials for its COVID-19 Legal Hotline Expansion that will connect low-income or unemployed individuals with critical legal assistance. Recognizing the sacrifices of health care workers, we partner with the Chicago Bar Association in its Wills for Healthcare Heroes Program, offering pro bono virtual estate planning services to first-responders and health care workers.
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
Pro bono is at the very core of the firm. Representing those without the resources to protect themselves reminds us that the work we do can make all the difference in the world. Our clients may change over the years but the ability to empower them is always extremely gratifying.
Responses submitted by Andrew Vail, Christian Tuddenham, Todd Toral, Michael Ross and Matt Price, pro bono committee co-chairs at Jenner & Block.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250