Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
Pro bono work is essential to the practice of law. Not only is it our duty to serve underprivileged communities and help promote justice, it's also a gift.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service. Simpson Thacher lawyers devote thousands of hours each year to pro bono engagements ranging from major impact litigations to representing individuals in immigration, housing, criminal and family law matters. The firm also has a longstanding practice forming and supporting small businesses and nonprofit organizations. Simpson Thacher is as well known for achieving extraordinary victories that right long-standing injustices, as it is for advocacy on behalf of marginalized and vulnerable clients.
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome. 1) We secured a landmark, first-of-its-kind consent decree in Brown v. Madison County, a class action lawsuit filed by Simpson Thacher, the [American Civil Liberties Union] and ACLU of Mississippi, challenging racially-motivated policing tactics by the Madison County Sheriff's Department in Mississippi. Achieved after 2½ years of litigation, the consent decree requires the department to reform its policies and practices with respect to checkpoints and pedestrian stops and is subject to verification by a community oversight board.
2) Immigration and Customs Enforcement released our clients onto the Manhattan streets after months of immigration detention at a correctional facility without providing discharge planning for the treatment of their significant mental health disorders. Both clients were hospitalized, one requiring months of psychiatric hospitalization to recover the treatment lapse. The firm brought lawsuits against ICE and the correctional facility, where we secured decisions that paved the way for settlement from defendants totaling $1.7 million.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work? Taking on these cases allowed us to address injustices both in our backyard and in our broader backyard. Both matters address grave injustices that have been perpetrated against populations that have long been marginalized, and who deserve to have their story told and the injustice remedied. The Madison County consent decree also potentially sets a standard for non-discriminatory policing that can be applied throughout the U.S.
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on? In the wake of COVID-19, the firm has formed rapid response teams to advise small business and nonprofit clients in [New York] and [California] on their economic recovery options. We have also focused on compassionate release efforts, co-counseling with the Mississippi Federal Public Defender to secure the release of vulnerable inmates.
Last month, we secured the release of our client, who spent 18 years in a California prison for a murder he did not commit. The court vacated his conviction based on determinations that the prosecution withheld material exculpatory evidence from the defense; and trial counsel rendered constitutionally deficient representation.
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer? Pro bono work is essential to the practice of law. Not only is it our duty to serve underprivileged communities and help promote justice, it's also a gift. I strongly encourage all lawyers to get involved as it will strengthen your practice, broaden your perspective and enrich your life.
Responses submitted by Jonathan Youngwood, global co-chair of the litigation department at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute read‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250