Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
Pro bono work is essential to the practice of law. Not only is it our duty to serve underprivileged communities and help promote justice, it's also a gift.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service. Simpson Thacher lawyers devote thousands of hours each year to pro bono engagements ranging from major impact litigations to representing individuals in immigration, housing, criminal and family law matters. The firm also has a longstanding practice forming and supporting small businesses and nonprofit organizations. Simpson Thacher is as well known for achieving extraordinary victories that right long-standing injustices, as it is for advocacy on behalf of marginalized and vulnerable clients.
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome. 1) We secured a landmark, first-of-its-kind consent decree in Brown v. Madison County, a class action lawsuit filed by Simpson Thacher, the [American Civil Liberties Union] and ACLU of Mississippi, challenging racially-motivated policing tactics by the Madison County Sheriff's Department in Mississippi. Achieved after 2½ years of litigation, the consent decree requires the department to reform its policies and practices with respect to checkpoints and pedestrian stops and is subject to verification by a community oversight board.
2) Immigration and Customs Enforcement released our clients onto the Manhattan streets after months of immigration detention at a correctional facility without providing discharge planning for the treatment of their significant mental health disorders. Both clients were hospitalized, one requiring months of psychiatric hospitalization to recover the treatment lapse. The firm brought lawsuits against ICE and the correctional facility, where we secured decisions that paved the way for settlement from defendants totaling $1.7 million.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work? Taking on these cases allowed us to address injustices both in our backyard and in our broader backyard. Both matters address grave injustices that have been perpetrated against populations that have long been marginalized, and who deserve to have their story told and the injustice remedied. The Madison County consent decree also potentially sets a standard for non-discriminatory policing that can be applied throughout the U.S.
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on? In the wake of COVID-19, the firm has formed rapid response teams to advise small business and nonprofit clients in [New York] and [California] on their economic recovery options. We have also focused on compassionate release efforts, co-counseling with the Mississippi Federal Public Defender to secure the release of vulnerable inmates.
Last month, we secured the release of our client, who spent 18 years in a California prison for a murder he did not commit. The court vacated his conviction based on determinations that the prosecution withheld material exculpatory evidence from the defense; and trial counsel rendered constitutionally deficient representation.
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer? Pro bono work is essential to the practice of law. Not only is it our duty to serve underprivileged communities and help promote justice, it's also a gift. I strongly encourage all lawyers to get involved as it will strengthen your practice, broaden your perspective and enrich your life.
Responses submitted by Jonathan Youngwood, global co-chair of the litigation department at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readDC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
3 minute read4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
3 minute readAm Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250