Walden Macht & Haran
There is great public service in achieving legal solutions that advance the greater good for humanity.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
The firm is committed to using the law to effect positive social change. Through pro bono and good government work, we fight on behalf of community and preservation groups, and classes of underprivileged individuals to hold the government accountable for misconduct that harms the public and infringes on civil rights. We encourage our lawyers to pursue the pro bono matters that are most meaningful to them, which include domestic violence, immigration, wrongful conviction, harassment allegations and custody proceedings.
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome.
Stemming from WMH's representation of Russian whistleblower and scientist Dr. Grigory Rodchenkov who revealed the Kremlin's state-sponsored doping scheme, Jim Walden authored new legislation, the Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act, which would establish criminal penalties and civil remedies for international doping fraud. The bill passed unanimously through the House in 2019 (and through the Senate Commerce Committee in February 2020).
At the request of the United Nations special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Dr. Agnes Callamard, a team of WMH attorneys, headed by Tim Macht, advised the special rapporteur on U.S. law concerning various civil and criminal remedies, duties of the U.S. and other governments toward intended victims of crimes (including duty to warn), and related issues arising under international treaties and other international law, in connection with her June 12, 2019, report to the Human Rights Council of the U.N. concerning the death of the Saudi journalist, Jamal Khashoggi.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work?
If one individual is suffering as a result of a broken system, others are probably experiencing the same problems. There is great public service in achieving legal solutions that advance the greater good for humanity. I think I'm most satisfied by using the law to serve both my clients and the public interest, and to simply achieve progress for people in their lives.
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on?
Representing all the district attorneys and assistant district attorneys in New York, WMH litigated a constitutional challenge to a statute that would subject our clients to a new oversight and discipline commission. WMH argued against New York state and the speaker of the State Assembly before the New York State Supreme Court on grounds that the commission violated provisions of the federal and state constitutions. On Jan. 28, the court declared the statute unconstitutional; a rare example of a statute being struck down on its face.
WMH is working on several pro bono matters, including with the Office of the Appellate Defender and Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts.
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
The world needs lawyers to take up causes, not just cases. There is often little profit in championing a cause, even a righteous one, and sometimes causes are unpopular with clients. But lawyers are needed now more than ever to promote social good and expose corruption.
Responses submitted by Jim Walden, founding partner of Walden Macht & Haran.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
GOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250