Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
Using our skills on behalf of people for whom such help is otherwise unavailable makes the world a fairer, more just place.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Wilmer encourages all lawyers, including new associates and summer associates, to participate in a wide variety of pro bono activities. We endorse the principle that every lawyer has a professional responsibility to use a portion of his or her time for pro bono legal service and recognize that pro bono work often exposes lawyers to types of legal and professional work that is not otherwise readily available.
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome.
In a groundbreaking sex trafficking case following four years of indomitable work, Wilmer secured a favorable settlement for trafficking survivor Lisa Ricchio in her claims against a motel and its operators under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA). Ricchio was lured from Maine to Massachusetts by a man who drugged, brutally beat and repeatedly raped her, trying to force her into prostitution, as he had done with others before. The [U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit] reversed a district court's initial dismissal of the case, endorsing our interpretation of the TVPA and establishing precedent for cases like these to proceed. At trial, we relayed the ordeal Ricchio suffered and she bravely took the stand. This case was the first of its kind to be filed against a hotel or motel under the TVPA's civil-remedy provision; today, there is clarification on what makes hotels/motels liable for sex trafficking on their premises under the TVPA.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work?
Winning a favorable settlement for Ricchio and establishing First Circuit precedent were extremely satisfying. The most gratifying aspect of this work, however, was playing a small part in our client's healing process. For years, she has felt the effects of [post-traumatic stress disorder] and chronic pain from her assault. With the legal case now behind her, she's now feeling a sense of empowerment and relief, and grateful in the knowledge that her bravery will help other survivors.
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on?
• Assisting immigrant detainees and criminal inmates seeking compassionate release in light of COVID-19.
• Representing the city of Baltimore in defending immigrant families against the State Department's public charge changes.
• Representing Wesley Purkey in proceedings regarding the permissibility of the federal government's lethal injection protocol, and in an appeal from the district court's denial of his habeas petition.
• Assisting the Innocence Project in review of Muhammad Abdul Aziz's conviction for killing Malcolm X.
• Assisting a class of unhoused persons in claims for lost property and emotional distress against California's Department of Transportation, pursuant to a settlement reached after much litigation.
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
Commitment to pro bono representation is a hallmark of Wilmer. It advances our profession and influences laws shaping the nation. Using our skills on behalf of people for whom such help is otherwise unavailable makes the world a fairer, more just place. Ms. Ricchio's case is a great example.
Responses submitted by Felicia Ellsworth, partner at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
GOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250