California Bar Exam Pass Rates Drop to All-Time Low 26.8% on February Test
The results, announced Friday night, come as bar officials are planning next week to give the California Supreme Court a plan for administering the September exam.
May 08, 2020 at 09:33 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The percentage of would-be lawyers who passed California's February 2020 bar exam plummeted to a historic low with fewer than 3 in 10 test-takers posting a passing score, according to figures released by the state bar Friday night.
Just 26.8% of the 4,205 applicants who completed the test passed. That's the lowest success rate recorded in California since at least 1951, the oldest figures provided by the bar.
"We heartily congratulate the 1,128 applicants who passed the general bar exam and the 163 candidates who passed the attorney's exam," Donna Hershkowitz, the bar's interim executive director, said in a prepared statement. "Meanwhile, we are moving forward on both near-term and long-term efforts that will affect the future of the bar exam."
On Monday, Hershkowitz said, the bar will give the California Supreme Court a plan for administering the September exam, which justices have called to be delivered online. Bar leaders also are studying the exam for possible changes in future content.
The February 2020 exam pass rate fell below what was then the historically low figure of 27.3% tied to the February 2018 test. The pass rate had climbed to 31.4 percent a year ago, offering hope that California's slumping scores were over.
But pass rates have dropped across the nation this spring. The national average score on the multistate bar exam—the 200-question multiple-choice portion of the attorney licensing test—fell 1.4 points from the previous year. according to the National Conference of Bar Examiners, which develops the test. That represents the lowest average February MBE score on record.
The mean scaled MBE score on the February 2020 bar exam in California was 1357, down from 1370 last year.
Virginia's February 2020 pass rate fell to 58%, down from nearly 63% the previous year. In New York, the pass rate dipped from 45% in February 2019 to 40% one year later. Pennsylvania saw the percentage of successful test-takers dropped, too, from 60.2% to 52.2%.
Florida was an outlier, seeing an increase from 58% in 2019 to 60% this February, while Tennessee's February pass rate held steady at 46%.
First-time test-takers from out-of-state, American Bar Association-accredited law schools posted a better pass rate than their California counterparts, 45% to 42%.
The names of those who passed the February exam will be posted Sunday at 6 a.m.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readBig Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Trending Stories
- 1Less Is More: The Risks of Excessive Data Collection from Mobile Devices
- 2New Reporting Requirements in the Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Sectors
- 3State Court Denies Firm's Attempts to Arbitrate Late Attorney's $10M Life Insurance Dispute
- 4Remote Work and Cybersecurity: Keeping Law Firm Data Safe Beyond the Office
- 5Prisoners Get Education Support, How About Victims?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250