Ex-Stone Prosecutor Jonathan Kravis' Career Advice: 'Stay True to the Principles That Led You to Serve'
"I resigned from a job I loved because I was not willing to serve a department that would so easily abdicate its responsibility to this principle," former federal prosecutor Jonathan Kravis said in a commencement-style op-ed for his alma mater Williams College.
May 26, 2020 at 12:45 PM
5 minute read
Three months ago, Jonathan Kravis resigned from the U.S. Justice Department in protest, dismayed by the decision of Attorney General William Barr to overrule career prosecutors and recommend a shorter prison term for President Donald Trump's longtime friend Roger Stone.
Since then, Kravis has described his decision to resign as the "most painful" of his career. Still, in a message to graduates of his alma mater, Williams College, he offered unsolicited career advice: "Consider government service."
His commencement-style message to the 2020 class, published in the Williams Record, included a recounting of Stone's case. Kravis noted that, a day after he and other career prosecutors suggested a prison term of between seven and nine years for Stone, Trump criticized the recommendation as a "miscarriage of justice." The Justice Department leadership stepped in to overrule the trial team and recommend a shorter prison term for the longtime Trump ally.
Stone was later sentenced to more than three years in prison and is now appealing his conviction on charges he obstructed a congressional inquiry, lied to investigators and threatened a witness.
In his message to the Williams College graduates, Kravis said the Justice Department leadership's intervention in the Stone case amounted, in his view, to an abandonment of "its commitment to equal justice under the law." It was that commitment, he said, that had initially drawn him to the Justice Department a decade earlier, which brought him to his "second piece of career advice."
"If you do decide to pursue government service—and I hope that you will—stay true to the principles that led you to serve. For me, that principle was our nation's commitment to equal justice under law, the idea that the government makes decisions in criminal cases based on facts and law, not on the defendant's power or wealth or political connections," he said. "I resigned from a job I loved because I was not willing to serve a department that would so easily abdicate its responsibility to this principle."
Kravis closed with a recommendation for what to do when the "institution you serve is no longer faithful to the values that led you to serve it in the first place."
"If that happens, I hope you will remember that your principles are more important than any job, and that sometimes you best serve an institution that you love by leaving it," he said.
Kravis' remarks to the graduating class echoed, and expanded on, an op-ed he wrote for The Washington Post earlier this month. He spoke out, for the first time then, after Barr moved to drop the prosecution of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn, who twice pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his communications with the Russian ambassador to the U.S.
"In both cases, the department undercut the work of career employees to protect an ally of the president, an abdication of the commitment to equal justice under the law," Kravis wrote. "Prosecutors must make decisions based on facts and law, not on the defendant's political connections. When the department takes steps that it would never take in any other case to protect an ally of the president, it betrays this principle."
The Justice Department has denied that its maneuvering in the Flynn and Stone cases was politically motivated. Barr has called the case against Flynn an "injustice." Thousands of former Justice Department prosecutors have assailed Barr over his push to abandon the Flynn case. The federal judge presiding over Flynn's prosecution has appointed a lawyer to argue against the effort to walk away from the case.
After departing the Justice Department, Kravis found a way to remain in government. In April, he joined the office of the D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine as a special counsel, a three-month consulting role in which he is helping to build up a new section focused on public corruption cases.
Kravis, who served as deputy chief of the fraud and public corruption section of the U.S. Attorney's Office in Washington, is also advising Racine on legislative changes that might be needed to empower the new unit in his office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250