General Litigation Winner: Kirkland & Ellis
"There is nothing more satisfying than being presented with a Gordian knot and developing a strategy to unwind it in the face of legal, factual or procedural challenges," Dan Donovan, Ragan Naresh and Kate Katz said.
May 26, 2020 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Describe your firm's approach to litigation and your strategy for building successful teams for trials or other matters. We immerse ourselves in the facts of the case and then build the right team. We have a deep and broad bench of talented litigators. Our lawyers get trial experience earlier than they would elsewhere, and we prepare for that with the Kirkland Institute of Trial Advocacy. Although many of our lawyers are trial lawyers and are not traditional specialists, many of them also have developed expertise in specific areas. That allows us to tailor teams to best suit the needs of a case and to ensure our clients get a trial-ready team from top to bottom.
Discuss the two biggest litigation cases your firm worked on in 2019 and how you reached successful outcomes. Kirkland won [more than $256 million] for BNSF Railway in its dispute with J.B. Hunt Transport over the parties' joint intermodal transportation business, which ships containers of goods across the country by rail and truck. On top of the [more than $256 million] in damages, Kirkland secured substantial going-forward value for BNSF based on the arbitrators' interpretation of the parties' contract. BNSF and Hunt are the largest U.S. intermodal providers, moving 70% of all domestic intermodal shipments annually.
After six years of litigation, the North Carolina Business Court granted summary judgment to Honeywell in a hotly-contested trade secret case concerning anti-ballistic materials used in combat helmets. The case involved a Honeywell helmet expert who previously worked for DSM Dyneema, Honeywell's chief market competitor. Following a nearly 10-hour hearing, the court issued an opinion in June 2019 rejecting all of DSM's claims and fully vindicating Honeywell.
What are the most challenging and satisfying aspects of your work in litigation? Clients come to Kirkland with their most challenging problems—they come with questions that have no easy answers, and when their very livelihood is on the line. We shine when the stakes are high and the answers are hard. There is nothing more satisfying than being presented with a Gordian knot and developing a strategy to unwind it in the face of legal, factual or procedural challenges. That is what attracts lawyers to Kirkland and keeps them here.
What is the most important piece of advice you'd share with young lawyers? Push your comfort zone. Don't look for cases with black-and-white answers; don't limit yourself to cases with easy facts. Find cases that force you to be creative, to think outside the box, to do things that you've never done before. That is where you grow as a lawyer.
Responses submitted by Kirkland & Ellis partners Dan Donovan, Ragan Naresh and Kate Katz. Donovan litigates energy, financial and technology disputes and has secured substantial victories in high-stakes matters nationwide. Naresh litigates civil matters in the energy, agriculture, telecommunications and consumer products industries. Katz focuses on complex commercial litigation and class action matters in federal and state courts.
Firm Facts:
Number of Partners in Firm's Litigation Department in D.C. | 86 |
Number of Associates in Litigation Department in D.C. | 77 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Litigation Department in D.C. | 13 |
Number of Partners in Litigation Department Firmwide | 387 |
Number of Associates in Litigation Department Firmwide | 362 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Litigation Department Firmwide | 49 |
Percentage of Firm Represented by Litigation Department | 29% |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250