General Litigation Winner: Kirkland & Ellis
"There is nothing more satisfying than being presented with a Gordian knot and developing a strategy to unwind it in the face of legal, factual or procedural challenges," Dan Donovan, Ragan Naresh and Kate Katz said.
May 26, 2020 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Describe your firm's approach to litigation and your strategy for building successful teams for trials or other matters. We immerse ourselves in the facts of the case and then build the right team. We have a deep and broad bench of talented litigators. Our lawyers get trial experience earlier than they would elsewhere, and we prepare for that with the Kirkland Institute of Trial Advocacy. Although many of our lawyers are trial lawyers and are not traditional specialists, many of them also have developed expertise in specific areas. That allows us to tailor teams to best suit the needs of a case and to ensure our clients get a trial-ready team from top to bottom.
Discuss the two biggest litigation cases your firm worked on in 2019 and how you reached successful outcomes. Kirkland won [more than $256 million] for BNSF Railway in its dispute with J.B. Hunt Transport over the parties' joint intermodal transportation business, which ships containers of goods across the country by rail and truck. On top of the [more than $256 million] in damages, Kirkland secured substantial going-forward value for BNSF based on the arbitrators' interpretation of the parties' contract. BNSF and Hunt are the largest U.S. intermodal providers, moving 70% of all domestic intermodal shipments annually.
After six years of litigation, the North Carolina Business Court granted summary judgment to Honeywell in a hotly-contested trade secret case concerning anti-ballistic materials used in combat helmets. The case involved a Honeywell helmet expert who previously worked for DSM Dyneema, Honeywell's chief market competitor. Following a nearly 10-hour hearing, the court issued an opinion in June 2019 rejecting all of DSM's claims and fully vindicating Honeywell.
What are the most challenging and satisfying aspects of your work in litigation? Clients come to Kirkland with their most challenging problems—they come with questions that have no easy answers, and when their very livelihood is on the line. We shine when the stakes are high and the answers are hard. There is nothing more satisfying than being presented with a Gordian knot and developing a strategy to unwind it in the face of legal, factual or procedural challenges. That is what attracts lawyers to Kirkland and keeps them here.
What is the most important piece of advice you'd share with young lawyers? Push your comfort zone. Don't look for cases with black-and-white answers; don't limit yourself to cases with easy facts. Find cases that force you to be creative, to think outside the box, to do things that you've never done before. That is where you grow as a lawyer.
Responses submitted by Kirkland & Ellis partners Dan Donovan, Ragan Naresh and Kate Katz. Donovan litigates energy, financial and technology disputes and has secured substantial victories in high-stakes matters nationwide. Naresh litigates civil matters in the energy, agriculture, telecommunications and consumer products industries. Katz focuses on complex commercial litigation and class action matters in federal and state courts.
Firm Facts:
Number of Partners in Firm's Litigation Department in D.C.
| 86 |
Number of Associates in Litigation Department in D.C.
| 77 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Litigation Department in D.C.
| 13 |
Number of Partners in Litigation Department Firmwide
| 387 |
Number of Associates in Litigation Department Firmwide
| 362 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Litigation Department Firmwide
| 49 |
Percentage of Firm Represented by Litigation Department
| 29% |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readAm Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250