General Litigation Winner: Zuckerman Spaeder
"The intense, shared experience of litigation inevitably creates strong bonds and great loyalty within our relatively small office setting. Being part of this culture is tremendously gratifying," Dwight Bostwick said.
May 26, 2020 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Describe your firm's approach to litigation and your strategy for building successful teams for trials or other matters. Zuckerman Spaeder is a litigation firm that handles a wide range of matters. Our case staffing is designed to achieve favorable outcomes whether we're representing 50,000 people against an insurance company or one person facing government prosecution. Rather than relying on large teams and a top-down reporting structure, we staff cases leanly with a few partners with significant trial experience aided by a small number of active and integrated associates. Our lawyers work across practice areas, handling criminal and civil cases representing plaintiffs and defendants, individuals and companies. This gives us the experience to thrive in a variety of settings.
Discuss the two biggest litigation cases your firm worked on in 2019 and how you reached successful outcomes. After taking the nation's largest health insurer to trial for widespread mental health claim denials, a federal court delivered a landmark ruling that The New York Times called "scathing." That class action win against United Healthcare will provide relief for over 50,000 plaintiffs and has been hailed as the Brown v. Board of Education for mental health parity.
This same year, our firm achieved arguably the nation's most significant criminal defense victory—a full acquittal of President's [Barack] Obama's former White House counsel, Gregory Craig. After investigating Craig, special counsel [Robert] Mueller's office referred his case to [the Southern District of New York]. Our team convinced those prosecutors to decline the case. However, the government indicted Craig in Washington, D.C., touting the case as a centerpiece of [Foreign Agents Registration Act] enforcement. After a lengthy trial, the jury deliberated only three hours before delivering a not-guilty verdict.
What are the most challenging and satisfying aspects of your work in litigation? It is satisfying to see our younger lawyers and other staff members develop and play leadership roles on cases and within the firm. The intense, shared experience of litigation inevitably creates strong bonds and great loyalty within our relatively small office setting. Being part of this culture is tremendously gratifying.
One challenge is maintaining work-life balance. Inevitably, litigation requires significant periods of intense preparation and work. This removes people from their families and other personal priorities. It's imperative, but difficult, to maintain commitment to one's work and to balance this with one's personal life.
What is the most important piece of advice you'd share with young lawyers? Most young lawyers are high achievers. They seek the next credential. I urge young lawyers to seriously reflect on what they want to accomplish in this profession and how to marry that goal with a healthy and fulfilling personal life.
Responses submitted by Dwight Bostwick, a partner at Zuckerman Spaeder and chairman of the firm's executive committee and partnership board. His practice focuses on complex commercial litigation and white-collar defense.
Firm Facts:
Number of Partners in Firm's Litigation Department in D.C. | 28 |
Number of Associates in Litigation Department in D.C. | 10 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Litigation Department in D.C. | 14 |
Number of Partners in Litigation Department Firmwide | 43 |
Number of Associates in Litigation Department Firmwide | 16 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Litigation Department Firmwide | 23 |
Percentage of Firm Represented by Litigation Department | 100% |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250