General Litigation Winner: Zuckerman Spaeder
"The intense, shared experience of litigation inevitably creates strong bonds and great loyalty within our relatively small office setting. Being part of this culture is tremendously gratifying," Dwight Bostwick said.
May 26, 2020 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Describe your firm's approach to litigation and your strategy for building successful teams for trials or other matters. Zuckerman Spaeder is a litigation firm that handles a wide range of matters. Our case staffing is designed to achieve favorable outcomes whether we're representing 50,000 people against an insurance company or one person facing government prosecution. Rather than relying on large teams and a top-down reporting structure, we staff cases leanly with a few partners with significant trial experience aided by a small number of active and integrated associates. Our lawyers work across practice areas, handling criminal and civil cases representing plaintiffs and defendants, individuals and companies. This gives us the experience to thrive in a variety of settings.
Discuss the two biggest litigation cases your firm worked on in 2019 and how you reached successful outcomes. After taking the nation's largest health insurer to trial for widespread mental health claim denials, a federal court delivered a landmark ruling that The New York Times called "scathing." That class action win against United Healthcare will provide relief for over 50,000 plaintiffs and has been hailed as the Brown v. Board of Education for mental health parity.
This same year, our firm achieved arguably the nation's most significant criminal defense victory—a full acquittal of President's [Barack] Obama's former White House counsel, Gregory Craig. After investigating Craig, special counsel [Robert] Mueller's office referred his case to [the Southern District of New York]. Our team convinced those prosecutors to decline the case. However, the government indicted Craig in Washington, D.C., touting the case as a centerpiece of [Foreign Agents Registration Act] enforcement. After a lengthy trial, the jury deliberated only three hours before delivering a not-guilty verdict.
What are the most challenging and satisfying aspects of your work in litigation? It is satisfying to see our younger lawyers and other staff members develop and play leadership roles on cases and within the firm. The intense, shared experience of litigation inevitably creates strong bonds and great loyalty within our relatively small office setting. Being part of this culture is tremendously gratifying.
One challenge is maintaining work-life balance. Inevitably, litigation requires significant periods of intense preparation and work. This removes people from their families and other personal priorities. It's imperative, but difficult, to maintain commitment to one's work and to balance this with one's personal life.
What is the most important piece of advice you'd share with young lawyers? Most young lawyers are high achievers. They seek the next credential. I urge young lawyers to seriously reflect on what they want to accomplish in this profession and how to marry that goal with a healthy and fulfilling personal life.
Responses submitted by Dwight Bostwick, a partner at Zuckerman Spaeder and chairman of the firm's executive committee and partnership board. His practice focuses on complex commercial litigation and white-collar defense.
Firm Facts:
Number of Partners in Firm's Litigation Department in D.C.
| 28 |
Number of Associates in Litigation Department in D.C.
| 10 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Litigation Department in D.C.
| 14 |
Number of Partners in Litigation Department Firmwide
| 43 |
Number of Associates in Litigation Department Firmwide
| 16 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Litigation Department Firmwide
| 23 |
Percentage of Firm Represented by Litigation Department
| 100% |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute read'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readAm Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250