Insurance Winner: Blank Rome
"We strive to provide young lawyers with the opportunity to take on meaningful roles early in our insurance cases," Jim Murray said.
May 26, 2020 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Describe your firm's approach to litigation and your strategy for building successful teams for trials or other matters. We distinguish ourselves by winning efficiently. We are trial lawyers, not discovery litigators. We approach each case with a plaintiff's mindset and advance the case toward trial. Delay postpones our client's recovery from the insurer. We begin thinking about, and crafting, an opening statement very early in the case and continue to develop and refine the theme of our case until trial. At the same time, we treat our adversaries with the utmost civility. We have a zero-tolerance policy regarding unprofessionalism within our group. A balanced approach of zealous advocacy and civility directly corresponds to successful results for our clients.
Discuss the two biggest insurance litigation cases your firm worked on in 2019 and how you reached successful outcomes. The Diocese of New Ulm (Minnesota) filed for bankruptcy protection in 2017, facing 101 claims of sexual abuse occurring from the 1950s to the 1970s. In 2019, the diocese reached a global settlement of $34 million. Of that, Jim Murray and Jim Carter assisted the diocese in recovering $26 million from insurers. Our practice handling insurance coverage for sexual abuse liability cases is second-to-none, having recovered nearly $1 billion in insurance proceeds. Trilantic Capital Partners pursued coverage under private equity liability policies for a series of lawsuits alleging that Trilantic was responsible for the ERISA withdrawal liabilities of portfolio companies. In a challenging matter of first impression regarding liabilities that jeopardized the private equity business model, Justin Lavella and John Heintz recovered sufficient insurance to reimburse Trilantic's defense costs and to pay a substantial portion of the underlying settlements.
What are the most challenging and satisfying aspects of your work in litigation? Challenging: maintaining the "profession." Rewarding: watching young attorneys learn the craft. The practice of law today is described simultaneously as a "business" and a "profession." Providing business-oriented results for our clients is our primary, constant goal. We accomplish that, in part, through striving to perfect the art of trial work. On the other hand, training young attorneys is much more difficult than 20 years ago, when it was acceptable for two lawyers to attend a deposition to learn the ropes. We strive to provide young lawyers with the opportunity to take on meaningful roles early in our insurance cases.
What is the most important piece of advice you'd share with young lawyers? Strive for simplicity. Talk and write clearly. Use short sentences. Cast aside legalese and scrap insurance-speak. It takes practice and discipline but it's achievable! Be civil and professional with opponents, witnesses and the court. Finally, a one-word amendment to Paul Simon's advice: "Preserve your reputation; it's all that's left you."
Responses submitted by Jim Murray, chairman of Blank Rome's insurance recovery group. Murray wrote that he has fought insurance companies for decades, leading to recoveries of over $1 billion from many lines of insurance. He is a fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers and the American College of Coverage Counsel.
Firm Facts:
Number of Partners in Firm's Litigation Specialty Department in D.C. | 9 |
Number of Associates in Specialty Department in D.C. | 5 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Specialty Department in D.C. | 1 |
Number of Partners in Specialty Department Firmwide | 17 |
Number of Associates in Specialty Department Firmwide | 12 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Specialty Department Firmwide | 3 |
Percentage of Firm Represented by Specialty Department | 5% |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250