Intellectual Property Winner: Latham & Watkins
"We start with the end in mind, to optimize the opportunity to "win" short of trial—to achieve our client's commercial objective—by preparing for trial," Michael Morin, Tara Elliott and Max Grant said.
May 26, 2020 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Describe your firm's approach to litigation and your strategy for building successful teams for trials or other matters. We are proud to have built a team of exceptional first-chair trial lawyers who consider ourselves peers, rather than being centered around just one or two rainmakers. With our team-first approach, we are able to rise to any occasion, no matter the size or complexity of the case; on any given day, I may be leading a case or happily carrying my colleague's bag. We are also intensely focused on developing our next generation of trial lawyers and have the best [intellectual property] litigators in the business, from our technical analysts and young associates to our most senior partners.
Discuss the two biggest intellectual property litigation cases your firm worked on in 2019 and how you reached successful outcomes. We had an exceptional year with more than a dozen notable wins. One was for Janssen (a Johnson & Johnson company) in a patent infringement suit against its blockbuster, multibillion-dollar cancer drug DARZALEX. We were asked to take over the case midstream, implemented and executed a game plan, and secured a complete victory on summary judgment days before trial. Another was for Adobe, on its market-leading Acrobat product. As in the Janssen case, we took over the matter for trial. While plaintiff sought damages up to $150 million, the jury awarded just 1% of that, later reduced to zero on JMOL. We employed our team-first approach in both cases, with multiple first-chair lawyers involved in each, supported by incredibly talented and diverse teams of young partners and associates, who played significant and meaningful roles.
What are the most challenging and satisfying aspects of your work in litigation? Going to trial with our team is the ultimate challenge, and delivering our client a jury verdict is the most satisfying result. We start with the end in mind, to optimize the opportunity to "win" short of trial—to achieve our client's commercial objective—by preparing for trial. We do that by empowering our lawyers to act independently toward our collective goal. We take great pride when we see the team firing on all cylinders, taking initiative and giving us the edge we need to deliver for our clients; the team is greater than the sum of its parts.
What is the most important piece of advice you'd share with young lawyers? Find a practice that both excites and challenges you. Surround yourself with solution-oriented lawyers. Early on, you learn to spot issues but it's important to also problem-solve. In a demanding profession, it's easier to put in the work necessary to be successful when you enjoy helping clients achieve their goals.
Responses submitted by Latham & Watkins partners Mike Morin, Max Grant and Tara Elliott. Morin is global vice chair of Latham's intellectual property litigation practice and global co-chair of the health care and life sciences industry group. Grant, former global chair of Latham's IP litigation practice, has tried over 25 IP cases to verdict. Elliott is a prominent and experienced first-chair IP and commercial litigation trial lawyer.
Firm Facts:
Number of Partners in Firm's Litigation Specialty Department in D.C. | 14 |
Number of Associates in Specialty Department in D.C. | 14 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Specialty Department in D.C. | 1 |
Number of Partners in Specialty Department Firmwide | 38 |
Number of Associates in Specialty Department Firmwide | 51 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Specialty Department Firmwide | 8 |
Percentage of Firm Represented by Specialty Department | 4% |
Note: These numbers have been updated, as of May 27, to reflect the attorneys in the firm's intellectual property practice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readArnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250