Products Liability/Mass Torts Winner: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
"Invest the time to become the authority in it, and don't be afraid to speak up," John Beisner, Jessica Miller and Geoffrey Wyatt said.
May 26, 2020 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Describe your firm's approach to litigation and your strategy for building successful teams for trials or other matters. What makes our group unique is our passion and enthusiasm. We don't care about egos or about seniority; all we care about is getting our client the best result possible. This attitude affects every aspect of our work from how we develop case strategies to building our team. It is not uncommon for a partner to call a second-year associate to get a fresh approach to an issue or argument, or defer to a younger attorney's strategy. We are successful because everyone in our group is equally engaged and influential and we all listen to and learn from each other.
Discuss the two biggest products liability/mass torts litigation cases your firm worked on in 2019 and how you reached successful outcomes. Johnson & Johnson faced a lawsuit seeking $5 billion in damages by a woman who alleged that baby powder use caused her to develop ovarian cancer. We handled the trial in a notoriously plaintiff-friendly jurisdiction, with very loose evidentiary rules that allowed plaintiffs to change experts at the last minute and introduce evidence about a recent voluntary product recall. Undeterred by the bad odds, we focused on the science, urged the jury to think for itself and evaluate the evidence without being influenced by plaintiffs' conspiracy theories, and convinced the jury to return a verdict for J&J. [The firm also represented] eClinicalWorks in a nationwide class action filed by the estates of two patients whose medical records supposedly contained inaccuracies as a result of alleged glitches in eCW's software. We secured a district court dismissal based on lack of standing, and the [U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit] affirmed.
What are the most challenging and satisfying aspects of your work in litigation? One challenge we face is that we often represent companies that have been vilified in the media by plaintiffs lawyers hoping to influence courts and juries. It's not a fair strategy, but it can be highly effective because judges read the news. As a result, we often walk into a court that has preconceived notions about our client. In some ways, though, that is also the most satisfying aspect of our work. We represent companies that make good products, some of which save people's lives. It's very satisfying to persuade judges and juries that our clients are being unfairly maligned.
What is the most important piece of advice you'd share with young lawyers? Make yourself indispensable by finding a niche area that you master and understand fully. Invest the time to become the authority in it, and don't be afraid to speak up. Colleagues and clients will immediately defer to you and value your expertise and skill regardless of your seniority.
Responses submitted by practice leader John Beisner, Jessica Miller and Geoffrey Wyatt, partners in Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom's mass torts, insurance and consumer litigation group. They have several decades of combined experience in handling complex tort and consumer fraud litigation controversies and are also active in litigation reform efforts.
Firm Facts:
Number of Partners in Firm's Litigation Specialty Department in D.C. | 3 |
Number of Associates in Specialty Department in D.C. | 6 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Specialty Department in D.C. | 3 |
Number of Partners in Specialty Department Firmwide | 5 |
Number of Associates in Specialty Department Firmwide | 19 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Specialty Department Firmwide | 10 |
Percentage of Firm Represented by Specialty Department | 2% |
Note: These numbers have been updated, as of May 27, to reflect the attorneys in the firm's products liability/mass torts practice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250