Describe your firm's approach to litigation and your strategy for building successful teams for trials or other matters. What makes our group unique is our passion and enthusiasm. We don't care about egos or about seniority; all we care about is getting our client the best result possible. This attitude affects every aspect of our work from how we develop case strategies to building our team. It is not uncommon for a partner to call a second-year associate to get a fresh approach to an issue or argument, or defer to a younger attorney's strategy. We are successful because everyone in our group is equally engaged and influential and we all listen to and learn from each other.
Discuss the two biggest products liability/mass torts litigation cases your firm worked on in 2019 and how you reached successful outcomes. Johnson & Johnson faced a lawsuit seeking $5 billion in damages by a woman who alleged that baby powder use caused her to develop ovarian cancer. We handled the trial in a notoriously plaintiff-friendly jurisdiction, with very loose evidentiary rules that allowed plaintiffs to change experts at the last minute and introduce evidence about a recent voluntary product recall. Undeterred by the bad odds, we focused on the science, urged the jury to think for itself and evaluate the evidence without being influenced by plaintiffs' conspiracy theories, and convinced the jury to return a verdict for J&J. [The firm also represented] eClinicalWorks in a nationwide class action filed by the estates of two patients whose medical records supposedly contained inaccuracies as a result of alleged glitches in eCW's software. We secured a district court dismissal based on lack of standing, and the [U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit] affirmed.
What are the most challenging and satisfying aspects of your work in litigation? One challenge we face is that we often represent companies that have been vilified in the media by plaintiffs lawyers hoping to influence courts and juries. It's not a fair strategy, but it can be highly effective because judges read the news. As a result, we often walk into a court that has preconceived notions about our client. In some ways, though, that is also the most satisfying aspect of our work. We represent companies that make good products, some of which save people's lives. It's very satisfying to persuade judges and juries that our clients are being unfairly maligned.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Nobody Else Knows': These Federal Appeals Courts Have Unique Local Rules
Cooley Hires Three Partners to Communications Regulations Practice in D.C.
Trump Defense Secretary Esper Joins Squire, Jenner Hires Senior DOJ Official
3 minute readNearly a Dozen Law Firms Engaged in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Claims
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 2What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 3Judge Blasts Authors' Lawyers in Key AI Suit, Says Case Doomed Without Upgraded Team
- 4Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 5Federal Judge Won't Stop Title IX Investigation Into Former GMU Law Professor
Who Got The Work
Burr & Forman partner Garry K. Grooms has entered an appearance for 4M Acquisitions and Wallace D. Tweden in a pending environmental lawsuit. The action, filed July 22 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the McKellar Law Group and Mark E. Martin LLC on behalf of Tennessee Riverkeeper, contends that the defendant's violated the Clean Water Act and Tennessee Water Quality Control Act by allowing for the discharge of pollutants into waters of the U.S. without obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge permit. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger, is 3:24-cv-00886, Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Tweden et al.
Who Got The Work
Ramsey M. Al-Salam, Gene W. Lee and Stevan R. Stark of Perkins Coie have entered appearances for R-Pac International in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 12 in New York Southern District Court by PinilisHalpern LLP and Friedman Suder & Cooke on behalf of Adasa Inc, asserts a single patent related to wireless sensors used for tagging products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, is 1:24-cv-06102, Adasa Inc. v. R-Pac International LLC.
Who Got The Work
Walmart has tapped lawyer Nicole M. Wright of Zausmer PC to defend a pending product liability lawsuit. The action was filed Aug. 12 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Wolfe Trial Lawyers on behalf of a plaintiff claiming burns from a defective propane tank. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Leitman, is 2:24-cv-12100, Hill v. Ferrellgas, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Kevin Simpson and James Randall of Winston & Strawn have stepped in to represent Comcast in a pending consumer class action. The case, filed Aug. 11 in Georgia Northern District Court by Kaufman PA, contends that the defendant placed pre-recorded debt collection phone calls to the plaintiff in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee, is 1:24-cv-03553, Pond v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC.
Who Got The Work
Potter Anderson & Corroon partners Christopher N. Kelly and Kevin R. Shannon have stepped in to represent cloud computing company Fastly and its top executives in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 23 in Delaware District Court by deLeeuw Law and Bragar Eagel & Squire on behalf of Mark Sweitzer, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that revenue growth in 2023 was primarily driven by a 'consolidation trend' in which companies simplified operations by reducing the number of content delivery network vendors under management, thereby reducing competition and increasing the defendant's market share. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gregory B. Williams, is 1:24-cv-00969, Sweitzer v. Nightingale et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250