White Collar Defense Winner: Winston & Strawn
"Take more risks, both in your work and in your career choices. The road less traveled may have more potholes and scary turns but often leads to a more scenic destination and a more interesting trip along the way," Abbe Lowell said.
May 26, 2020 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Describe your firm's approach to litigation and your strategy for building successful teams for trials or other matters. We build teams by matching the case with the most experienced attorney from a substantive, industry, and procedural perspective (e.g., investigation, compliance, trial, appeal). We staff across offices to put the best team in the field. We invest in first-chair and "on-your-feet" training at all skill levels. Junior attorneys develop substantive specialties and learn courtroom skills from day one. Our white collar practice has developed a talent model emphasizing courtroom and investigation skills, grounded in apprenticeship, to develop instincts and judgment. This pays off in the form of a lean, thoughtful and powerful team.
Discuss the two biggest white collar litigation cases your firm worked on in 2019 and how you reached successful outcomes. In representing Banco San Juan Internacional and its owners relating to a search warrant and a civil forfeiture action alleging serious sanction and other criminal violations and seizing $53 million, we secured an order declaring the search unconstitutional, litigated the forfeiture and settled with the government, which conceded its case was based on faulty information, returned the $53 million (minus an administrative penalty), and entered into a [nonprosecution agreement] with the bank, its directors and [its] officers.
We obtained the final acquittal of Sen. Hector Martinez, following an eight-year litigation battle including two trials and four appeals (including one to the U.S. Supreme Court). The government alleged that co-defendant Juan Bravo bribed Martinez by paying for some travel expenses in exchange for Martinez's support for two popular public safety bills (already sponsored by Martinez) that passed the Senate nearly unanimously.
What are the most challenging and satisfying aspects of your work in litigation? The most challenging and rewarding aspects are two sides of the same coin. Prosecutors have never had more authority and power than they do now. Being able to pose a strong counterbalance to that and actually succeed—often—is very gratifying. This is especially true when representing companies that, after the Arthur Anderson case, rarely go to trial but for which our work has resulted in successful resolutions and where our trial and appellate work stand up well against the government's typically 95% or higher individual conviction rate.
What is the most important piece of advice you'd share with young lawyers? Take more risks, both in your work and in your career choices. The road less traveled may have more potholes and scary turns but often leads to a more scenic destination and a more interesting trip along the way.
Responses submitted by Abbe Lowell, co-chair of the white collar, regulatory defense, and investigations practice at Winston & Strawn. Lowell's practice involves investigation, trials and appeals of complex, high-profile criminal and civil matters. He has successfully tried or appealed cases involving various serious charges before juries in 15 different states and before 10 courts of appeals. He served as chief minority congressional counsel during the Clinton impeachment proceedings.
Firm Facts:
Number of Partners in Firm's Litigation Specialty Department in D.C. | 6 |
Number of Associates in Specialty Department in D.C. | 3 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Specialty Department in D.C. | 0 |
Number of Partners in Specialty Department Firmwide | 21 |
Number of Associates in Specialty Department Firmwide | 14 |
Number of Other Attorneys in Specialty Department Firmwide | 1 |
Percentage of Firm Represented by Litigation Department | 4% |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250