Senators Urge Roberts to Make SCOTUS Livestreams Permanent
"[T]here is no reason why pro-transparency measures should end when the court returns to its normal functions," the senators said.
May 29, 2020 at 01:05 PM
3 minute read
A bipartisan pair of Senate Judiciary Committee veterans are calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to keep livestreaming its oral arguments when the justices return for their October term.
Sens. Chuck Grassley and Patrick Leahy, who have both previously chaired the committee, made the request to Chief Justice John Roberts in a letter Friday. They urged the court "to make permanent its recent efforts to increase transparency" after it began offering live audio feeds of remote oral arguments held during the COVID-19 pandemic in a historic first.
The senators argued the court has "clearly demonstrated its technical capability to provide prompt disclosure and transparency to the public. And from all indications, the business before the court was conducted in as dignified and professional a manner as is witnessed inside the courtroom under more normal circumstances."
The senators also pointed to polls showing widespread approval from Americans for the livestreams as well as positive media coverage of the arguments.
"Given this widespread support for access to our nation's highest court—and the countless contributions it makes towards the civics education of the American public—there is no reason why pro-transparency measures should end when the court returns to its normal functions," the senators wrote.
The letter concludes by urging Roberts to consider their request "and bear in mind all those who would benefit most—including our democracy itself—from these simple yet meaningful measures of transparency."
Court watchers largely described the telephonic and livestreamed oral arguments as a win, although not all were pleased with the argument format. There were a handful of snafus—Justice Sonia Sotomayor more than once forgot to unmute her line when questioning advocates, and the sound of a toilet flush in the background of one argument drew jokes and conspiracies over who was responsible.
Friday's letter is the latest push for the famously opaque court to adopt more transparency reforms. Lawmakers pushed legislation to bring cameras into the Supreme Court as Roberts presided over the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump earlier this year, which placed the chief justice in a highly visible role.
Another legislative package introduced earlier this year would also require the court to start offering live audio of oral arguments within two years of the bill becoming law.
Democratic Rep. Mike Quigley, who oversees the House appropriations subcommittee that funds the federal judiciary, in March similarly urged Roberts to start livestreaming arguments.
"The right to open court must keep pace with the times. You recently invited members of Congress to observe oral arguments at the court. I encourage you and your fellow justices to extend that invitation to the American people in ways that technology now make commonplace. The country, the Constitution, and the judiciary would be better for it," Quigley wrote.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Solana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute readFederal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Fancy Dress': ERISA Claim Accuses Plan Administrator and Cigna Affiliates of Co-Pay Maximizer Scheme
- 2The American Lawyer's Top Stories of 2024
- 3Semiconductor Component Maker Accused of Deceiving Investors About Market Downturn, Export Curbs
- 4Zuckerman Spaeder Gets Ready to Move Offices in DC, Deploy AI Tools in 2025
- 5Pardoning Jan. 6 Defendants May Send Bad Message About Insurrection, Rule of Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250