'We Need Good Judges': Keith Ellison Urges Progressives to Consider the Judiciary
The Minnesota attorney general also urged American Constitution Society members to help create change in their communities in the wake of George Floyd's death.
June 10, 2020 at 06:07 PM
3 minute read
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison on Wednesday urged progressive members of the legal community to consider becoming judges as the country grapples with how to fight racial injustice.
Ellison made the remarks as part of the left-leaning American Constitution Society's national convention, which is being held virtually this year due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The top law enforcement officer for the state of Minnesota is overseeing the prosecution of former Minneapolis police officers for the death of George Floyd, and last week increased a third-degree murder charge to second degree against former officer Derek Chauvin, who held his knee on Floyd's neck for over eight minutes.
In prerecorded remarks delivered during the third day of the ACS's convention ahead of a panel on progressive priorities, Ellison urged viewers to consider the judiciary as an avenue to effect change, saying "we need people in the American Constitution Society to deal with all aspects of this problem."
"We need to build an ethic that going into the judiciary is a noble and positive pursuit," he said. "Some people are great advocates, but that doesn't mean they couldn't be a good arbiter of justice, a good judge. We need good judges."
Noting that he "may be an exception to the rule" because he doesn't want to be a judge, Ellison said ACS members can also help to recruit. And he said he was troubled by the current composition of the federal judiciary, including the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Ellison also urged ACS members to act as community leaders in combating racism and creating change and reforms, saying they don't have to act as lawyers to take action.
"We are right in an inflection point where, if the lawyers and the legal workers of the American Constitution Society are willing to be part of this reform movement, we can make real change," he said.
Liberal judicial groups are trying to become more of a leader on judges, after conservative figures associated with groups such as the Federalist Society have played a leading role in vetting judicial nominees for President Donald Trump. The Senate is nearing the milestone of confirming 200 Article III judges put forward by the Trump White House.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSean Combs' Defense Counsel Seeks Hearing, Gag Over Alleged Leaks by Government
Wave of Office Closures Highlights the Weighty Stakes Surrounding Law Firm Growth
7 minute read'Effective Remedy'?: DOJ Unveils Corrective Action Plan in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readAssistant Solicitor General Heads to Paul Hastings to Co-Chair Appellate Practice
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250