The NLJ 500: Steady Growth, But What's Ahead?
Head count jumped by 2.5% at the nation's largest firms in 2019. But that was before the pandemic.
June 23, 2020 at 08:55 AM
8 minute read
At the nation's 500 largest U.S.-centric law firms, another year of financial success meant another year of bolstering head count. But the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic might lead to firms trimming their ranks when 2020 is all said and done.
In 2019, this group increased its head count by 2.5% on average, with those numbers rising from 169,477 to 173,694 lawyers, the same amount of growth that was seen from 2018 to 2019. But the economic damage being wrought by the pandemic could wipe those gains away.
The U.S. legal industry suffered a net loss of 64,000 jobs in April, although 3,200 jobs were added in May, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. And the overall unemployment rate across the entire U.S. economy is 13.3%. Jeffrey Lowe, the global practice leader of Major, Lindsey & Africa's law firm practice group, said he doesn't expect headcounts to go anywhere but down across the board.
"It's going to inevitably mean a reduction in headcount at most places," Lowe said.
That's because compensation is the largest cost any law firm has to pay, Lowe said. Law firms only have so many levers they can pull to head off a downturn in business before it starts affecting their personnel, he added.
"I think a lot of firms were able to hide behind a very robust economy," Lowe said. The pandemic will make it "very clear which firms are in trouble and which will be strong enough to ride it out."
The pandemic has impacted law firms all over the NLJ 500. In 2019, Baker McKenzie, the largest U.S.-centered law firm on the 2020 NLJ 500, saw its head count grow by 1.9%, to 4,809 lawyers. In April, the firm announced it was reducing salaries for all of its nonpartner attorneys in the U.S. by 15%—in 2019, Baker McKenzie had 2,911 associates and 409 other lawyers. Baker McKenzie's 1,489 partners will also see cuts, with the 684 equity partners taking a bigger hit than others.
Other NLJ 500 firms haven't been so lucky. Dorsey & Whitney; Goldberg Segalla; Husch Blackwell; McDermott Will & Emery; Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone; Reed Smith; Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr; Seyfarth Shaw; Taft Stettinius & Hollister; and Womble Bond Dickinson—law firms whose head counts grew between 2.2% and 7.1% in 2019—have all laid off or furloughed employees as a result of the pandemic.
Whether law firms have any regrets about expanding just before the country experienced a severe economic downturn depends on how thoughtful they were with their hiring, said Zeughauser Group consultant Mary Young.
"It really depends on the firm's strategy and the markets in which they expanded. If they expanded in a thoughtful way, to enhance their position in markets where they already had strengths and to bolster their brands and better serve clients, then I doubt they have regrets," Young said. "If they pursued growth for growth's sake, they might have regrets depending on whether they happen to have a practice mix that provides advantages in this market."
Ditto for firms that shrank their overall head count in 2019. If law firms cut people so they could increase their productivity or get rid of underperforming practices, "they are probably breathing easier because those moves would have strengthened their firms," Young said.
But those firms aren't invulnerable to the pandemic. NLJ 500 firms such as Greenspoon Marder, Nixon Peabody and Vedder Price saw their lawyer head counts drop by 1% to 2.7% in 2019 and have also laid off employees as a result of the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Dinsmore & Shohl posted one of the highest percentages of growth on the 2020 NLJ 500, bolstering its ranks by 16.5% in 2019. Joshua Lorentz, who chairs the firm's intellectual property department and its finance committee, discussed how he feels the firm's increased head count will position the firm in a pandemic.
"We don't think it'll be a liability. We think it makes us stronger," Lorentz said. This year alone, Dinsmore has added 35 lawyers to its ranks, but it has had to furlough staffers who were unable to work remotely. "We're going to look for opportunities. We're going to try to step forward."
For Lorentz, the question of whether the firm has too many— or too few—lawyers during the pandemic can be answered in part by the numbers of hours they're billing. But hours only tell part of the story, he said.
"It's more than just a metric," Lorentz said. "You have to trust your practice group leaders about what's happening on the ground, not just the metrics."
The Outlook Across U.S. Cities
Major legal U.S. markets such as Houston, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.—as well as London —all saw head count growth in 2019, between 2.2% (Washington) and 8.3% (Houston). Chicago's numbers, on the other hand, stayed relatively flat, slightly shrinking by 0.2% year over year.
Texas continues to be an area of interest for law firms. ALM Intelligence in November 2019 reported that 82 law firms on the Am Law 200 had at least one office in the Lone Star State by the end of 2018—that's 157 offices with 4,067 lawyers. According to the 2020 NLJ 500, Houston, Dallas and Austin saw their lawyer bases increase by 8.3%, 10.2% and 12.2%, respectively.
Minneapolis, which legal consultants have described as being the second-most-important market in the Midwest (the first being Chicago), saw seven new firms setting up shop in 2019, including three major mergers. But that city's contingent of lawyers shrunk by 2.5% last year. Opening an office in a new city can be a complicated, time-consuming and expensive affair in a normal circumstance. And Lowe predicted that as the pandemic continues, law firms are going to be especially careful about branching out into new markets.
Amid the pandemic, at least one firm is evaluating its expansion plans. Seyfarth, ranked 44th on the 2020 NLJ 500, increased its head count by 4.5% in 2019. Some of the lawyers Seyfarth brought on last year were supposed to act as the firm's beachhead in Seattle, which the firm planned to launch this year. Due to the financial pressures caused by the pandemic, Seyfarth has cut salaries and furloughed employees. When asked about Seyfarth's expansion plans, a firm spokeswoman said in April the firm is "evaluating everything and continuing to build for the future." In a follow-up call in May, the firm declined to comment further on their plans to expand into Seattle and Dallas.
Legal consultants believe the industry is poised to change following the pandemic. With firms reporting that they've stayed productive even as their lawyers work remotely, that might cause some law firms to reexamine their office locations in expensive major markets.
It's not a new conversation for law firms, Young and Lowe noted. Firms have already ditched their law libraries, Young said. And at some firms, partners have the same size office as associates, Young said. However, Young noted that, in the short term, law offices will actually need more physical space in order to fully comply with social distancing guidelines various states have issued.
A study from Robert Half International, a human resources consulting firm, found that 74% of workers want to keep working remotely once the various stay-at-home orders have been lifted.
"We'll likely see more firms fully embrace a comprehensive digital work environment, with remote work becoming the norm versus the exception," said Jamy Sullivan, executive director of Robert Half Legal.
Sullivan said Robert Half is seeing law firms use contract or temporary attorneys more for contract drafting and review, as they relate to new government regulations, insurance claims and mortgage refinancing.
"In an uncertain economy, it's not unusual for firms and legal departments to rely on legal experts who are hired on a temporary, project or contract basis," Sullivan said. "While firms may feel cautious about hiring, at the same time, they have work that must get done and don't want to be understaffed."
A correction: Seyfarth Shaw, as of press time, has furloughed, but has not laid off employees, according to a firm spokeswoman. This story has been updated to reflect that. Additionally, with respect to Seyfarth's expansion plans during the pandemic, in an interview with a reporter in May, the firm said it had no further comment beyond an earlier statement a firm spokeswoman gave in April that it is "evaluating everything and continuing to build for the future." The firm has not indicated that any expansion plans have been disrupted by the pandemic. The story has been updated to reflect this.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
- Wombel Bond Dickinson
- Arnstein Lehr
- Baker McKenzie
- Seyfarth Shaw
- Reed Smith
- Goldberg Segalla
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister
- Nixon Peabody
- Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Dinsmore & Shohl
- Dorsey & Whitney
- Vedder Price
- Husch Blackwell
- Greenspoon Marder
- Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250