'Not a Close Call': Calif. Appeals Court Reverses Reduced Sentence Against Man Convicted of Hate Crime
"We've seen enough to make it difficult to shock us. But not, as it turns out, impossible," the panel said in overturning a trial judge's sentence.
June 24, 2020 at 04:59 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A California appeals court reversed a trial court's decision to lower a third-strike defendant's sentence to five years for a hate crime against a Black pregnant woman at a Fullerton, California, bus station.
The trial court reduced Tyson Theodore Mayfield's sentence of 25 years to life because he pleaded guilty early in the proceedings, and he did not pose a danger to society or use a weapon during the crime, where he repeatedly called a woman the "n-word" and threatened to make her "drop her baby." The woman was able to flee to a nearby cafe and call the police. The crime is one of several violent acts Mayfield committed against minorities.
In an opinion filed Tuesday, a panel for California's Fourth District Court of Appeal said it were shocked by the circumstances of the case, which Orange County Superior Court Judge Roger Robbins presided over.
"The members of this panel have enjoyed long careers in the practice of law," wrote acting Presiding Justice William Bedsworth on behalf of Associate Justices Richard Fybel and David Thompson. "We've seen enough to make it difficult to shock us. But not, as it turns out, impossible."
Robbins dismissed a prior strike conviction that occurred in 2005, reducing Mayfield's number of strike's to two. The appellate panel noted the discretion afforded to trial courts regarding criminal sentencing, but found Robbins' reasoning for striking the defendant's prior conviction, which primarily relied on the circumstances involving the most recent hate crime against the pregnant woman, did not withstand scrutiny.
"We are always loath to reject the exercise of such discretion," Bedsworth wrote. "But this is not a close call."
The panel pushed back against Robbins' suggestion that, because Mayfield did not use a "tangible weapon," the crime was less severe.
"The result was an eight-month pregnant woman running for her life—and the life of her unborn child—from declarations of overt and despicable intent," the justice wrote. The threatening language and expletives toward a pregnant woman "demonstrates a danger to society as clearly as displaying a knife or a screwdriver."
Mayfield committed 18 offenses during the 20-year period leading up to the crime against the pregnant woman in 2018. In 2006, he said epithets at a nonwhite couple after they said they didn't have any spare change and punched the man to the point where he needed eight stitches and had trouble eating and talking for a period of time, according to the opinion. In 2017, he asked a Turkish man with dreadlocks for a light, and when the man said he didn't smoke, Mayfield called him the "n-word" and began punching him. For that incident, Mayfield was convicted of a felony hate crime, which the trial court "inexplicably" reduced to a misdemeanor and sentenced him to a year in jail, the panel said.
"When the defendant's criminal behavior is driven by racist attitudes, greater punishment is generally deemed warranted on the basis such conduct inflicts unique harm to both the individual victim and society as a whole," they wrote.
The court found that Mayfield's prior convictions show he is willing and able to physically harm victims, and that nothing in the record says he wouldn't have done the same to the pregnant woman if she wasn't able to run away and call the police.
Although Robbins decided that Mayfield saved the state some expense by pleading guilty early in the case, the appellate court found Mayfield's status as a "'revolving door' career criminal" nullifies those savings.
"Any expense saved the state by his plea would likely be re-incurred with interest if he gets out in five years and there are still bus stops," Bedsworth wrote.
Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer, who appeared repeatedly in front of Robbins to argue against the reduced sentence, said the decision echoes the outrage he expressed to the trial court for allowing "such an evil person the opportunity to continue to victimize innocent people because of the color of their skin."
"The abuse of discretion and the complete disregard by the Court of the traumatic impact this crime had on the victim—a young, pregnant woman who literally ran for her life and the life of her unborn child—is nothing less than tragic," Spitzer said in a statement. "She begged the Court to give the defendant more than five years behind bars and the Court ignored her. Thankfully, the Orange County District Attorney's Office heard her and so did the Fourth District Court of Appeal."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute read'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250