Roger Stone Gets 2-Week Pause on Prison Time After Judge Nixes 2-Month Request
The judge said Stone must remain in home confinement during that time.
June 26, 2020 at 06:32 PM
5 minute read
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson on Friday granted Roger Stone a two-week delay of his prison surrender date, short of the two month postponement he sought citing concerns over the COVID-19 pandemic.
In a minute order, Jackson wrote the delay "affords the defendant seventy-five days beyond his original report date." A jury returned a guilty verdict against Stone in November, but his report date was not set until Jackson denied his motion for a new trial in April.
The federal judge also said Stone must remain in home confinement during that time, referencing a memorandum from the attorney general "and the strong medical recommendation submitted to the court by the defense." She said pretrial services could monitor Stone to make sure he complies with the order, if needed.
"This will address the defendant's stated medical concerns during the current increase of reported cases in Florida, and Broward County in particular, and it will respect and protect the health of other inmates who share defendant's anxiety over the potential introduction and spread of the virus at this now-unaffected facility," Jackson wrote.
Jackson also indicated that she included a sealed opinion alongside her order, but believes the document "could be unsealed in its entirety because while it refers to sealed pleadings, it does not identify any medical condition or conditions or contain any private medical information." She requested the parties tell her by Monday about whether they believe the opinion can be unsealed and if any portions of it should be redacted.
Stone's docket indicates that there are several sealed filings entered with the court surrounding his surrender date. His attorneys have filed medical records under seal as part of their argument to delay the report date.
Stone earlier this week filed the motion to push off his original surrender date of June 30, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and his medical conditions. The same day the motion was filed, the House Judiciary Committee released the written testimony of a former prosecutor on the case, alleging that DOJ officials pushed for a lighter sentence recommendation for Stone due to his ties to President Donald Trump.
Stone's filing, signed by his attorneys, Grant Smith and Seth Ginsberg, said the Department of Justice did not oppose the motion. But Jackson requested that DOJ officials file a separate brief laying out the reasoning for their position, including any department policies on agreeing to delay surrender dates and similar cases where prosecutors took the same stance.
In a filing late Thursday, prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia told Jackson they did not oppose the motion under a department policy instructing prosecutors to do so for cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Correctional facilities are a hot spot for the virus.
"For that reason—and that reason only—the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia does not oppose defendant Roger J. Stone's request to extend his voluntary surrender date for up to 60 days," the prosecutors wrote.
In a separate filing Friday, also made at Jackson's request, Stone's attorneys wrote they had requested on June 1 that Stone's surrender date be pushed to June 30 but did not hear back from the Bureau of Prisons.
"On or about June 10, 2020, government counsel informed undersigned counsel that he had been in contact with BOP and had been informed that BOP was no longer extending surrender dates based on COVID-19 and that, therefore, BOP would not be changing Stone's June 30, 2020 surrender date. BOP's determination led to discussions between the parties that ultimately resulted in Stone's decision to file his Unopposed Motion to Extend Surrender Date," the filing reads.
Prosecutors said in Thursday's filing that Stone's surrender date was set in mid-April and included an email among Bureau of Prisons authorities discussing the scheduled date and Stone's health issues in light of the pandemic.
A Washington, D.C., jury last year found Stone guilty of all charges brought forward by Special Counsel Robert Mueller III, including lying to the House Intelligence Committee about the identity of intermediary to WikiLeaks ahead of the 2016 election and witness tampering.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250