Dozens of Big Law Firms Received Millions in PPP Loan Funds
At least 45 law firms in the Am Law 200 received SBA loans this year.
July 06, 2020 at 01:35 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
This article has been updated to include more names and comments from some firm recipients.
More than three dozen Am Law 200 firms—and scores of other law firms across the country—have received paycheck protection loans from the Small Business Administration, including Boies Schiller Flexner, Kasowitz Benson Torres and Hughes Hubbard & Reed, according to recipient data released by the SBA on Monday.
The names of applicants applying for loans of more than $150,000 range from some of the largest Am Law 200 firms, such as Boies Schiller, already in the news for a series of partner exits this year, to many prominent midsize firms and plaintiff firms.
In March, Congress earmarked $350 billion in funding to dole out as business loans amid the coronavirus pandemic and the economic turmoil that has followed. While restaurants, health care firms and car dealerships were some of the top recipients of large loans, law firms and lawyers were also eager to apply.
In all, Law.com found at least 45 law firms in the Am Law 200—more than a fifth of the nation's 200 highest-grossing law firms—that received SBA loans this year.
The following Am Law 200 firms—which all posted gross revenues of more than $100 million in 2019—have received between $5 and $10 million loans:
- Boies Schiller Flexner
- Thompson & Knight
- Wiley Rein
- Schiff Hardin
- Armstrong Teasdale
- Hughes Hubbard & Reed
- Kasowitz Benson Torres
- Robins Kaplan
- Spencer Fane
- Pryor Cashman
- Cole, Scott & Kissane
- Stroock & Stroock & Lavan
- Kobre & Kim
- GrayRobinson
- Kelley Drye & Warren
- Bond, Schoeneck & King
- Hodgson Russ
- Honigman
- Sherman & Howard
- Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis
- Knobbe Martens
- Day Pitney
- Robinson & Cole
- Morris, Manning, & Martin
- Ice Miller
- Adam and Reese
- Phelps Dunbar
- Miles & Stockbridge
- Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone
- Butler Snow
- Cole Schotz
- Gibbons
- McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter
- Benesch
- Porter Wright Morris & Arthur
- Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick
- Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch
- Rutan & Tucker
- Smith, Gambrell & Russell
Meanwhile, Am Law 200 firms that received $2 to $5 million loans include Shutts & Bowen; Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle; Arnall Golden Gregory; Hinckley, Allen & Snyder; and Sullivan & Worcester.
For some of the firms who received money, the PPP loans were key to avoiding the mass layoffs and furloughs that have rippled through the industry.
Thompson & Knight said that it applied for the loan because its "primary goal during these uncertain times is to protect our people, continue to provide outstanding service to our clients, and to give back to the communities we serve."
A Kasowitz spokeswoman said that their loan, in addition to "substantial cost-saving measures and greatly reduced partner distributions," allowed the firm to retain hundreds of employees at full salary and benefits "without interruption."
And while there were dozens of Am Law 200 firms that received loans, the majority of law firms that applied for PPP monies are small and midsize firms making less than $100 million.
High-end California intellectual property boutique Keker, Van Nest & Peters received between $2 and $5 million.
Prominent firms outside the Am Law 200 that also received loans including Barclay Damon; Herrick, Feinstein; Best Best & Krieger; Rivkin Radler; Cullen and Dykman; Morrison Cohen; Moses & Singer; Olshan Frome Wolosky; Mendes & Mount; Phillips Nizer; Carter Ledyard & Milburn; Cohen & Gresser; Labaton Sucharow; Phillips Lytle; and Seward & Kissel.
Kent Zimmermann, a law firm management consultant at Zeughauser Group, said that receiving a PPP loan doesn't necessarily mean that a firm is in financial trouble. Almost every firm he has spoken to during the pandemic at one time considered a PPP loan, and most of the larger Am Law 100 firms, he added, didn't even qualify.
"Some firms faced existential threats going into this downturn and a small group still face existential threats," Zimmermann said. "And I personally don't think that it's necessarily fair to shame organizations that complied with the law."
Wigdor LLP, which has notably represented Vanina Guerrero in an EEOC complaint against DLA Piper related to partner Louis Lehot and who has filed a flurry of suits against Fox News, was approved for an April loan between $350,000 and $1 million, according to the government's data. Wigdor partner Douglas Wigdor said that the firm withdrew its application and never received the funds.
Honigman has already paid back its loan.
"Honigman had determined to pay back the PPP loan prior to the expiration back in May, prior to the expiration of the safe harbor period," said Kevin Kiefer, the firm's director of business development.
Going forward, many firms, after facing down the initial turmoil and uncertainty in March, have been pleasantly surprised by a steady level of productivity, Zimmermann added. And some firm partners are already clamoring to receive their full draws, he said. But when taking into account rising cases in several states and subsequent rollbacks of reopenings in states like Florida and Texas, he adds that there may be a second economic wave threatening law firms in the near future.
"It ain't over yet," Zimmermann said.
Ryan Barber and Ben Hancock contributed to this report.
An earlier version of this article incorrectly described the type of action against DLA involving Louis Lehot. It was an EEOC complaint, not a lawsuit. The article has also been updated to reflect Wigdor's statement that his firm withdrew its application and didn't receive the loan money.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
O'Melveny, White & Case, Skadden Beef Up in Texas With Energy, Real Estate Lateral Partner Hires
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250