Pandemic-Related Work Brings Windfall in Typically Down Lobbying Quarter
Several federal relief programs, coupled with varying industries looking to take advantage of those available funds, drove a strong Q2 showing for lobbying firms.
July 21, 2020 at 04:00 PM
5 minute read
Typically the fiscal quarters leading up to a U.S. presidential election are marked by a downturn in business for the lobbying industry. This makes sense, as there is often an air of uncertainty about who firms and their clients should be lobbying when it is unclear which political party will be in control come the new year. Like it has done with everything else, the pandemic has turned that on its head.
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck topped the second quarter lobbying revenue list, bringing in $12.9 million over the last three months, which according to their internal numbers is a 29% increase from the same period in 2019 and a 17% increase in the firm's haul from the first fiscal quarter.
They weren't the only ones doing well. Four of the top five law firms for lobbying revenue saw an increase from Q1 to Q2, with only Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which led the pack in Q1, showing a slight decline.
After Brownstein at $12.9 million, the top five firms included Akin Gump with $12.4 million, a slight drop from their group-leading $12.6 million in the first quarter but a 21.4% increase year over year; Holland & Knight came in at $7.15 million, up 19% year over year; Squire Patton Boggs at $6.67 million, up 11% from the same period in 2019; and K&L Gates at $5.1 million, up 15.4% YoY.
Marc Lampkin, the government relations co-chair and Washington, D.C., office managing partner at Brownstein, said he believes the increase in business is due to three primary factors: The complications around understanding the initial federal responses to the pandemic, such as the CARES Act, the Paycheck Protection Program and Main Street Lending Program; the more-than-likely prospect of more funds and aid being necessary now that the outbreaks have increased so dramatically in the last month; and the potential of a second term for the current administration, which could come with a variety of executive orders surrounding companies in China that have an effect on U.S. businesses.
"When you look at COVID-19, the line of demarcation is March 13," Lampkin said in an interview. "If you would have asked us in February if we thought there would be a rush of business, I would have thought perhaps a little. But no one could have anticipated this sort of response."
Lampkin said on top of the usual suspects involved in active lobbying, the firm saw an increase in business from companies and industry groups that normally don't pay that close attention to the D.C. lobbying scene.
"Companies realized they needed to get smart on these regulations real fast," he said.
And he isn't alone in citing the pandemic as the primary driver for lobbying growth.
"The level of activity that we have seen over the last six months is unprecedented, evidenced by back-to-back quarters of more than $12 million in LDA revenue, which are our strongest ever," Hunter Bates, co-chair of Akin's public law and policy practice, said in an email. "A major driver of this work has of course been the ongoing pandemic, which continues to have an enormous effect on the economy and touches pretty much every sector and industry."
Bates and Lampkin both agreed that the recent surge in U.S. COVID-19 cases and the anticipated relief package being debated in the House and Senate would continue to fuel growth in the third quarter as well.
"Looking ahead to the third quarter, the response to COVID-19 will continue to be a major driver of activity as we prepare for the 2020 elections and the changes and uncertainties that they may bring," Bates said in the same email.
As lobbying is a fairly static and cyclical revenue generator, it isn't surprising to find the same names at the top of the revenue list quarter after quarter. Over the past couple of years, it has been a back-and-forth between D.C. mainstay Akin Gump and Colorado-based Brownstein for the top spot.
Akin took Q1 of 2020, while Brownstein vaulted back to lead Q2. Both firms have a significant revenue lead over the remaining top firms.
|Read More:
New Federal Lobbying Leader? Brownstein Bests Akin Gump in Q2 Revenues
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readHigh Verdicts and Venue Rule Land Pa. Courts on Top of 'Judicial Hellhole' List
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1House Passes Bill to Add Federal Judgeships in Face of Biden Veto Threat
- 2As AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
- 3Texas Lawyer, Client Sued for $10 Million Over Bitcoin Mining Deal
- 4Final Misconduct Hearing Date Impending for Fulton Judge
- 5Senate Panel Postpones Vote on Reconfirmation of Democrat Crenshaw to SEC
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250