'It's Retaliation': US Judge Orders Michael Cohen Released From Prison, Finding Free Speech Rights Were Curtailed
U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the Southern District of New York said in a hearing that in his 21 years on the bench, he had "never seen" a clause requiring that a candidate for home confinement agree not to speak to the media.
July 23, 2020 at 12:12 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A Manhattan federal judge on Thursday ordered Michael Cohen released from prison, finding that his June 9 remand into custody was done in retaliation for his forthcoming tell-all book about his time working as President Donald Trump's personal attorney.
U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the Southern District of New York said in a hearing that in his 21 years on the bench, he had "never seen" a clause requiring that a candidate for home confinement agree not to speak to the media, and he roundly rejected the government's claims that Cohen's jailing was the result of his failing to cooperate with the terms of his release.
"I make the finding," Hellerstein said, "that the purpose of transferring Mr. Cohen from furlough and home confinement to jail is retaliation, and it's retaliation because of his desire to exercise his First Amendment rights."
Under Hellerstein's order, Cohen, who has been under quarantine at FCI Otisville, would be tested for COVID-19 and released from prison by 2 p.m. Friday. Cohen's attorneys agreed that he would still comply with the gag order until they could negotiate a new agreement with the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's office that would not violate their client's rights under the U.S. Constitution.
While Cohen would be allowed to write and edit his book, Hellerstein did, however, note that Cohen's release would come with some restrictions on his interactions with the media.
Attorney's said they would need about a week to work out a new agreement.
Cohen had sued the federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Attorney General William Barr on Monday, claiming that officials had sent him back to prison in order to prevent him from publishing his book. According to the lawsuit, the book describes Cohen's "first-hand" experience working as the president's fixer and includes accounts of anti-Semitic and "virulently racist" remarks that Trump had allegedly made about Black leaders, including President Barack Obama and Nelson Mandela
In a statement, Cohen's attorney, Danya Perry, said Hellerstein's order was a "victory for the First Amendment and we appreciate the judge's ruling confirming that the government cannot block Mr. Cohen from publishing a book critical of the president as a condition of his release to home confinement."
"This principle transcends politics and we are gratified that the rule of law prevails," said Perry, who argued at Thursday's hearing.
Government lawyers from the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office, which had prosecuted Cohen in 2018 for tax fraud and lying to Congress, denied any link between the book and Cohen's remand, claiming that he had refused to sign off on the reasonable terms of his release.
In court papers, they cited a signed declaration by Cohen's probation officer, who said that Cohen and his attorney, Jeffrey Levine, had been "combative" during the July 9 meeting and challenged "nearly every provision" of an electronic monitoring agreement to allow Cohen to serve out the remainder of his three-year prison sentence from home.
The decision, they said, had been "instigated" by the probation officer, Adam Pakula, and was ultimately approved by a BOP official with "no knowledge" of Cohen's upcoming book.
On Thursday, Hellerstein said there was no reason to attribute Cohen's hesitation to "intransigence." Rather, he said, the meeting appeared to be a standard negotiation by an attorney on behalf of his client.
"People object and then there are negotiations and discussions, and once people realize they can't move any further, they agree," Hellerstein said. "Mr. Cohen and Mr. Levin were never given a change to agree."
"What's an attorney for," the judge asked, "if he's not going to negotiate an agreement for his client?"
A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office declined to comment Thursday.
READ MORE:
Prosecutors Deny Link Between Michael Cohen's Prison Remand and Planned Tell-All Book About Trump
Cohen Claims Retaliation in Prison Remand, Saying He Was Targeted Over Planned Tell-All Trump Book
Michael Cohen Returns to Federal Prison After Early Summer Furlough in Manhattan
Michael Cohen Released to Home Confinement Because of COVID-19 Concerns
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute readSidley Adds Ex-DOJ Criminal Division Deputy Leader, Paul Hastings Adds REIT Partner, in Latest DC Hiring
3 minute read‘High Demand’: Former Trump Admin Lawyers Leverage Connections for Big Law Work, Jobs
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Justice Department Sues to Block $14 Billion Juniper Buyout by Hewlett Packard Enterprise
- 2A Texas Lawyer Just Rose to the Trump Administration
- 3Hogan Lovells Hires White & Case Corporate and Finance Team in Italy
- 4New York District Attorneys Endorse Governor's Proposed Rollback of Discovery Reforms
- 5Greenberg Traurig Launches Munich Office with Eight Hires, Including McDermott Group
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250