Maker of 'Naked' Condoms Could Be Stripped of Trademark Rights
Despite an apparent 2007 settlement, rival Australian Therapeutic Supplies has statutory standing to bring a cancellation action against Naked TM, the Federal Circuit rules.
July 27, 2020 at 06:50 PM
2 minute read
The company that first marketed the "Naked" brand of condoms has statutory standing to sue for cancellation of a rival's mark—even if a settlement between the parties may ultimately prove a bar to damages.
Reversing a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruling by a 2-1 vote, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that an apparent deal between Australian Therapeutic Supplies Pty. Ltd. and Naked TM LLC is not a bar to a cancellation proceeding.
"An absence of proprietary rights does not in itself negate an interest in the proceeding or a reasonable belief of damage," Judge Jimmie Reyna wrote for the majority in a precedential opinion. Instead, Australian can bring the cancellation if it has "a real interest in the cancellation proceeding and a reasonable belief of damage."
Judge Evan Wallach dissented, saying Australian specifically agreed not to challenge Naked's use and registration of the Naked mark. That leaves Australian "no more than an intermeddler here," Wallach wrote in Australian Therapeutics Supplies v. Naked TM.
Australian first began selling Naked condoms in 2000. Naked TM's predecessor-in-interest filed a trademark application for Naked condoms in 2003. Australian asserted its rights in 2006, and the parties apparently reached a settlement under which Naked received the rights to the mark in the United States, while Australian got rights to the Nude brand of condoms. Australian argues that the parties never hammered out final terms.
"Australian's advertising and sales of Naked condoms in the United States since April 2003, coupled with its pending application for registration of its unregistered mark, demonstrates that Australian is not a mere intermeddler," Reyna wrote. "These acts instead demonstrate a real interest and reasonable belief of damage, as contemplated for a cause of action under 15 U.S.C. Section 1064."
The court remanded the case to the TTAB for further proceedings.
Wallach wrote that he agreed with Reyna's formulation of the test, but concluded that Australian had not met it.
James Menker of Atlantic Beach, Florida's Holley & Menker had the winning argument for Australian. Suzanne Meehle of Orlando's Meehle & Jay represented Naked TM.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readFTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHealth Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readHospital Succeeds in Denying Vaccine Religious Accommodation Through 'Undue Hardship' Defense
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250