Like Ginsburg, Justices Have Confronted Health Concerns Throughout History
Justices such as Hugo Black and John Marshall Harlan II "fully participated in the past via telephone from distant lands and from their nearby hospital beds," one scholar said.
July 31, 2020 at 06:43 PM
4 minute read
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg speaking in September in Washington. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi / ALM
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who recently disclosed a new fight with cancer, insists she will continue her 27-year tenure "as long as I can do the job full steam."
There is no reason to suggest that Ginsburg will renege on that pledge. And in every past health issue she has had, Ginsburg has barely missed an argument and has kept up with her workload.
"As long as she can mentally understand the cases and cast votes, then she is fully discharging her duties," said Artemus Ward, a political scientist and author of the book "Deciding to Leave," about justices' departures from the court. "Anyone who suggests that physical decline is somehow grounds for departure is incorrect as a historical matter. Nothing can force her to leave the court short of impeachment and death."
Ward pointed to justices such as Hugo Black and John Marshall Harlan II who "fully participated in the past via telephone from distant lands and from their nearby hospital beds."
Ginsburg did the same in May when she participated in oral argument via teleconference from Johns Hopkins Hospital. All justices were participating remotely during that period because the court was shut down in light of the pandemic.
David Garrow, author of an extensive 2000 article about mental decrepitude and incapacity of Supreme Court justices, documented that debilitated justices in the past have worked from home or even hospitals for extended periods.
Especially since the upcoming term of the court may keep the justices home because of the pandemic as it did at the tail end of last term, Garrow said Ginsburg "may not have to be at the court" to do her work.
One of Garrow's case studies of extended disability involved Justice Frank Murphy, who served on the court from 1940 to 1949. He was hospitalized several times in 1946 and 1947, and in 1948 was unable to be present at the court's October term until December. He was addicted to painkillers, a circumstance that got worse and more visible over time.
Garrow said Murphy often "deputized" fellow Justice Wiley Rutledge to cast his votes, though Murphy's biographer wrote that "there is no indication that Murphy's excessive use of drugs during his last two terms on the court materially affected his performance as a justice. None of the available evidence suggests that he behaved erratically in public during this period."
Justice William O. Douglas is a better-known example of justices who stayed on in spite of ill health. Douglas suffered a stroke in December 1974 at age 76. He did not return to the court until March 24, 1975. He met with reporters the next day, and they reported he was clearly impaired by the stroke. He said he would listen to all the argument tapes he had missed, but his health got worse.
Friends and others urged him to retire, but he persisted, sometimes dozing off as he attended arguments. His colleagues resolved not to have any decision hinge on Douglas' vote or to assign him an opinion or to join an opinion he wrote.
But one justice, Byron White, balked at the moves to block Douglas, illustrating that expelling a justice is not easy to do. White acknowledged in a letter to his colleagues that it would have been wise for Douglas to retire. But he said it was not up to the justices to determine Douglas' fate, because the Constitution gives only Congress the power of removing justices, through the impeachment power.
White added that Douglas "listens to oral arguments, appears in conference and casts his vote on argued cases. He thus not only asserts his own competence to sit but has not suggested that he is planning to retire."
Earlier this week, Ginsburg underwent what the court described as a "minimally invasive non-surgical procedure" at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York. The procedure was to "revise a bile duct stent." The court said in a statement earlier: "The justice is resting comfortably and expects to be released from the hospital by the end of the week."
She was released from the hospital Friday, a court spokesperson said. Ginsburg was home and doing well.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued? ‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2023/11/15438u-767x633-9.jpg)
‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued?
![American Bar Association Calls for Enforceable Supreme Court Ethics Code American Bar Association Calls for Enforceable Supreme Court Ethics Code](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/b2/01/bcb6a43842ebb6b598f1eca96f06/american-bar-association-washington-dc-office-8823-767x633.jpg)
American Bar Association Calls for Enforceable Supreme Court Ethics Code
![What’s at Stake in Supreme Court Case Over Religious Charter School? What’s at Stake in Supreme Court Case Over Religious Charter School?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/05/9a/9be68a5f4bb0bdf1add9a8a2e048/st-isidore-of-seville-catholic-virtual-school-767x633.jpg)
What’s at Stake in Supreme Court Case Over Religious Charter School?
Trending Stories
- 1Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: 700+ Residents Near Ohio Derailment File New Suit, Is the FAA to Blame For Last Month's Air Disasters?
- 2Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
- 3A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025
- 4Ex-Prosecutor Denies on Witness Stand That She Tried to Protect Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 5Latham's Lateral Hiring Picks Up Steam, With Firm Adding Simpson Practice Head, Private Equity GC
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250