In courts across the country, the Trump campaign has filed lawsuits challenging the counting of mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, which President Donald Trump has lost, but few have failed to stick. Instead, judges—both federal and state—have scrutinized lawyers arguing on behalf of the president’s campaign on the evidence presented in their courts on observing ballot-counting and whether there’s any evidence those ballots were fraudulently cast.

Finding that evidence lacking, judges have largely swatted down the legal challenges. Here’s a look at the judges behind those rulings, and what they’ve had to say about the Trump campaign’s arguments.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]