The U.S. Supreme Court building is seen in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 23, 2020. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
Which way would you rather lose? That’s a question that lawyers for Sergio Ramirez are probably asking themselves right now.
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument March 30 in TransUnion v. Ramirez, a class action under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The case presents important questions—from what kinds of statutory violations support Article III standing to what makes a class representative “typical” under Rule 23(a)—that seem certain to divide the justices and make an affirmance unlikely. But just how the court resolves the case may wind up being more important to class-action litigants than the bottom line.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
