For a week in February, our productivity plummeted as we sat transfixed, listening to arguments during the second impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. As Americans, we were watching history. As trial attorneys, we were watching something else: a future law school advocacy course on what to do and what not to do.

While the impeachment managers were persuasive, conservative and liberal pundits alike excoriated Trump’s team. Politics aside—and despite the outcome—the managers were just plain better. They convinced most of the Senate (including seven Republicans) to convict, making this the most bipartisan impeachment in history. According to a Feb. 15 ABC News/Ipsos Poll, nearly 60% of Americans believe Trump should have been impeached for inciting the Capitol attack, and three-quarters believed senators voted based on partisanship. Justsecurity.org tracked statements from senators who voted to acquit and found that over half believed the managers proved their case but based their vote on jurisdictional grounds (something the Senate had previously rejected by majority vote). If this were a high school debate competition, the managers won the persuasiveness ballot. But why?

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]