Daniel Cantor, left, and John Freedman, right, of Arnold & Porter.Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
Our firm recognizes that it is a privilege to be able to partner with incredible legal service providers to use our skills to represent courageous clients who are fighting injustice and unfairness.
May 04, 2020 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Arnold & Porter's philosophy of pro bono is simple: everyone should have equal access to justice, and our society should be governed by the rule of law. To that end, all of our lawyers are encouraged to spend 15% of their time on pro bono work. We represent not only sympathetic clients but also those who may be unpopular and for whom the vindication of civil rights and justice is most elusive. —Dan Cantor
What are the two biggest cases your firm worked on in 2019? Tell us more about those cases and how you reached the outcome.
In June 2018, the firm filed two suits—separate challenges to the Trump administration's decision to add a citizenship question to the decennial census and to terminate the Central American Minors (CAM) program (a family reunification immigration program). The census strategy was to go fast (to trial) and big by building an unassailable factual record demonstrating political motivation and arbitrariness, to be able to sustain the trial court victory from inevitable appeals. We never stopped building that record, and made further submissions to strengthen our case even after the Supreme Court argument. The court ruled in our favor 5-4, and the administration gave up.
The CAM strategy was to stay small and focus on the families that had a clear right to relief. After we obtained a preliminary injunction, the administration decided to settle, paving the path for 2,700 Central American children to be reunited with their families. —John Freedman
What was the most satisfying aspect of that work?
Winning in these cases made a tremendous difference for our clients. For CAM, that meant we were able to help reunite 2,700 children with their families. For census, it meant that all our clients' members could participate and be counted free from fear the information they provide to the government would be abused to enforce immigration laws; this ultimately will mean more resources and political power for the communities our clients serve. —John Freedman
What other pro bono matters is the firm working on?
Arnold & Porter continues its innovative work in voting rights, winning a major victory in voter suppression in North Carolina. We defeated a motion to dismiss in a groundbreaking case on behalf of families separated at the border seeking compensation for their emotional trauma, and we obtained a significant jury verdict for Planned Parenthood in a case against anti-abortion activists. In response to COVID-19, we have filed lawsuits in Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Colorado to reduce the risk in jails and detention centers, and more than 70 of our lawyers are advising restaurant workers and other employees in unemployment benefits. —Dan Cantor
Why does pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
Our firm recognizes that it is a privilege to be able to partner with incredible legal service providers to use our skills to represent courageous clients who are fighting injustice and unfairness. Fighting for these clients gets me up in the morning and keeps me working late into the night. —John Freedman
Responses submitted by Dan Cantor, chair of the pro bono program, and John Freedman, senior pro bono counsel, at Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read
Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute read
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
