DC Firm's Return Policy: Stay Home or Work in Office Whenever You Need
Midsize firm Gilbert embraced a concept known as hoteling, or hot-desking. Offices and work areas are available to all staff, but they are not assigned.
June 17, 2021 at 07:53 PM
6 minute read
Legal ServicesWhat You Need to Know
- Gilbert LLP was already preparing a fully hybrid working model in in early 2019.
- When the pandemic hit, all its lawyers and staff already had experience remote working.
- The firm has designed and constructed new offices to promote collaboration, and encourages team members to work from home whenever possible.
Pre-Pandemic Planning
In 2018, the lawyers, staff and management at Gilbert came together to discuss what they wanted the future of life and work at the firm to look like. Their lease in a traditional downtown D.C. office was coming up in a couple of years, and there was a widespread feeling among the team that it was an opportunity to rethink office life. "This was more than a year before the pandemic," said Litherland. "We wondered just how much people were using their offices during the week and realized that at any point in time—whether it be because of traveling, court appearances or client meetings—about a third of us weren't even in the office." That insight made Litherland think about not only their physical space but also their office's 10 minutes' walk from the White House, their near neighbors the likes of Covington & Burling, White & Case and Jenner & Block. "Gilbert's leadership concluded that the long-standing model of law firm operations would not last," the firm wrote in a white paper about their transformation. "New influences were gaining traction—technology, diversity, flexibility, and changing views with respect to effective teamwork. Traditional hierarchies, workplaces and methods could not attract and retain the next generation of legal innovators." By late 2019, the firm had found new offices outside the downtown area, near the popular Eastern Market—a local gourmet food hall in the city's Southwest region. Gilbert signed the lease late that year and began construction of their new space in January 2020.This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFenwick and Baker & Hostetler Add DC Partners, as Venable and Brownstein Hire Policy Advisers
2 minute readSignaling Growth Goals, Some Law Firms Promote Record Partner Classes
Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
4 minute readDC's Birchstone Moore Combines With Chicago-Founded Wealth Planning Firm
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250