Former Trump SG Noel Francisco Returns to SCOTUS for Catholic Diocese's Abortion Challenge
Jones Day partner Francisco challenges a 2017 New York regulation that requires employer health insurance plans to cover abortions.
August 19, 2021 at 01:07 PM
3 minute read
Former Trump administration Solicitor General Noel Francisco is back in the U.S. Supreme Court with his first petition since leaving that office a year ago. And he has a familiar client and a familiar issue: the Roman Catholic Church and abortion.
Francisco returned to Jones Day as a partner in July 2020 after serving three years as solicitor general of the United States. He argued 17 cases while in that office on issues ranging from the Trump so-called travel ban to religious freedom, separation of powers and property rights.
His office and then-U.S. Attorneys General Bill Barr and Jeff Sessions also mounted a strong campaign against nationwide injunctions, which they often fought when judges blocked controversial Trump administration policies.
Francisco's first petition since returning to Jones Day is in the case Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v. Lacewell. Linda Lacewell is the superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services.
In the petition, Francisco challenges a 2017 state regulation that requires employer health insurance plans to cover abortions—except those "tax-exempt entities that have the 'purpose' of 'inculcating … religious values' and primarily 'employ' and 'serve' those of the same religious persuasion."
Francisco argues that the regulation burdens a subset of religious organizations that have a broader purpose, such as serving the poor, or that employ or serve members of other faiths or no faith. He asks the justices to decide whether the mandate to cover abortions is "neutral and generally applicable" under the high court's 1990 decision in Employment Division v. Smith and its 1993 decision in Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah. The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, ruled the regulation was neutral and generally applicable and so did not run afoul of the First Amendment's religion clauses.
"Finally, if there is a question as to whether the Free Exercise Clause protects religious entities against this mandate under Smith, the court should revisit that decision," he wrote in the petition. "It cannot be that the Constitution allows New York to require religious groups to participate in a practice so fundamentally in conflict with their religious beliefs."
The Supreme Court in June declined to revisit the Smith ruling in its decision in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, although three justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch—said they were prepared to overrule it.
The state, represented by New York Solicitor General Barbara Underwood, must file a response by Aug. 23.
Jones Day has had a long relationship with the Catholic Church. In 2012, the firm's managing partner Stephen Brogan, then a trustee of Notre Dame University, fielded a team of lawyers to represent pro bono 43 Catholic dioceses, schools, hospitals, social service organizations and other institutions in challenges to the Affordable Care Act's requirement that employer health insurance plans cover contraception.
In 2018, Cardinal Donald Wuerl, leader of the Catholic Church in Washington, tapped Jones Day for legal advice on matters relating to a Pennsylvania grand jury report documenting thousands of child sexual assault victims at Catholic dioceses in Pennsylvania.
And last December, the Archdiocese of Washington hired a team of Jones Day attorneys, including former White House counsel Don McGahn, to sue Washington, D.C., over its pandemic restrictions for religious institutions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
Justices Grill US Government in Venue Dispute Over FDA Vape Challenges
22-Count Indictment Is Just the Start of SCOTUSBlog Atty's Legal Problems, Experts Say
5 minute readSupreme Court Will Hear Religious Parents' Bid to Opt Out of LGBTQ-Themed School Books
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250