The Marble Palace Blog: Author John Grisham and Supreme Court Thrillers
You may wonder what Grisham and his book have to do with the U.S. Supreme Court, but there are connections.
October 22, 2021 at 12:18 PM
4 minute read
United States Supreme Court
Thank you for reading The Marble Palace Blog, which I hope will inform and surprise you about the Supreme Court of the United States. My name is Tony Mauro. I've covered the Supreme Court since 1979 and for American Lawyer Media since 2000. I semiretired in 2019, but I am still fascinated by the high court. I'll welcome any tips or suggestions for topics to write about. You can reach me at [email protected].
Famed author John Grisham has a new book out this week, titled "The Judge's List." It's certain to be a bestseller, because Grisham's legal thrillers are always bestsellers.
You may wonder what Grisham and his book have to do with the U.S. Supreme Court (aka the Marble Palace.) After all, as the title suggests, it is about a judge, not a justice. But there are connections:
—> In 1992, in his early days as an author, Grisham wrote "The Pelican Brief," which began with the assassination of two Supreme Court justices. It was one of the earliest books in the Supreme Court thriller genre, and was soon turned into a movie featuring Julia Roberts and Denzel Washington. Footnote below: My favorite Supreme Court thrillers.
-—> Grisham was a practicing lawyer and state representative in Mississippi and has continued to keep up with legal matters even as he writes. He's a longtime supporter of the Innocence Project. In 2008, when he was promoting his book "The Appeal," he was asked whether the plot line—a corporate executive bankrolling the election of a state Supreme Court judge to rig a case—was far-fetched. "It's already happened," Grisham answered. "It happened a few years ago in West Virginia." That was a reference to the Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. case, which had similar features.
—>This week, New York Times Supreme Court correspondent Adam Liptak asked Grisham what he thought about the current Supreme Court. Grisham's answer: "It's very distressing. I think the Supreme Court lost so much credibility in 2000 when five Republicans on the court saw a chance to elect a president, and that's what they did. And at that point, it became a very political court, and that has not changed over the years, certainly not in the past four years. The way McConnell was able to hijack the Supreme Court was just hard-core raw politics. And it's probably not going to change for many, many years. It's now the Trump court."
—> When Justice Elena Kagan's decision in Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist. Court was handed down in March, legal writing expert Ross Guberman effused that Kagan may now be able to "claim the title of the greatest living legal writer." He added, "Ten years after writing about cars in bankruptcy, she turns to a specific-jurisdiction matter involving a Ford Explorer. How does she make civil procedure sound like John Grisham?" That's high praise.
My Favorite Supreme Court Thrillers (Aside From 'The Pelican Brief')
- "The Tenth Justice" (1997) by Brad Meltzer, with a blackmailed law clerk twist.
- "The Last Justice" (2012), "The Advocate's Daughter" (2016) and "The Outsider" (2017), all by Anthony Franze, involving clerks, justices and court advocates. Counsel at Arnold & Porter, Franze is the only Supreme Court practitioner to write in the genre.
- "Supreme Ambitions" (2014) by David Lat, spotlighting aspiring law clerks.
- "9 Scorpions" (1998) by Paul Levine, starring a law clerk with an unusual background.
- "While Justice Sleeps" (2021) by Stacey Abrams, also with a law clerk in hot water.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUnder Suspension in California, Eastman Continues Supreme Court Practice
8 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
Lingering Questions at Supreme Court About Climate Change Litigation Need Resolution
6 minute readJustices Ask If They Should Have Even Taken Nvidia’s Appeal of Investor Suit
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250